EIN: 262037695
UEI: SK32M9ZYA2M6
Data as of August 24, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 6, 2024 (748 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Criteria: 2 CFR, Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, §200.510(b) requires that auditees prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502. Condition Found, Including Perspective: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) prepared by management contained differences between federal expenditures reported and the amounts supported by the underlying books and records. In addition, there is no evidence of management’s detail review of the reconciliation between the underlying expenditure detail to the SEFA to ensure that amounts are properly presented. Possible Cause and Effect: While the System performs a review during the compilation of the SEFA, controls were not designed or implemented effectively to identify errors in the SEFA and to maintain evidence of management’s detail review of the reconciliation between the underlying expenditure detail to the SEFA. Questioned Costs: None
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 2 CFR, Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, §200.510(b) requires that auditees prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502. Condition Found, Including Perspective: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) prepared by management contained differences between federal expenditures reported and the amounts supported by the underlying books and records. In addition, there is no evidence of management’s detail review of the reconciliation between the underlying expenditure detail to the SEFA to ensure that amounts are properly presented. Possible Cause and Effect: While the System performs a review during the compilation of the SEFA, controls were not designed or implemented effectively to identify errors in the SEFA and to maintain evidence of management’s detail review of the reconciliation between the underlying expenditure detail to the SEFA. Questioned Costs: None
Grady’s corrective action plan: 1. Going forward, Grady will have a formal agenda to discuss and approve the SEFA prior to submission. 2. The SEFA will be reviewed, approved and attested by the Grady’s VP Of Fiscal Services and the Executive Director of Internal Audit. 3. Differences above established thresholds will be reviewed and addressed
Criteria: 45 CFR section 75.303 (a) states non-federal entities must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 45 CFR section 75.303 (b) states non-federal entities must: Comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Recipients of provider relief funds must support all expenses with adequate documentation and maintain proper control documentation to substantiate that these funds were used for health care-related expenses or lost revenues attributable to coronavirus. Condition Found, Including Perspective: There is no documentation to evidence of management’s review of the HRSA portal submission prior to their submission to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Possible Cause and Effect: While the System maintains that review did take place prior to the portal submission, controls were not designed or implemented effectively to maintain evidence of management’s review. Questioned Costs: None.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 45 CFR section 75.303 (a) states non-federal entities must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 45 CFR section 75.303 (b) states non-federal entities must: Comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Recipients of provider relief funds must support all expenses with adequate documentation and maintain proper control documentation to substantiate that these funds were used for health care-related expenses or lost revenues attributable to coronavirus. Condition Found, Including Perspective: There is no documentation to evidence of management’s review of the HRSA portal submission prior to their submission to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Possible Cause and Effect: While the System maintains that review did take place prior to the portal submission, controls were not designed or implemented effectively to maintain evidence of management’s review. Questioned Costs: None.
Grady’s corrective action plan: Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation will implement the control and process of completing an attestation assuring compliance with the review of the PRF data in the HRSA portal prior to submission. The review was completed online at the time of the submission but was not formally documented. This will be done and retained by Grady as support going forward
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.