THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK

EIN: 237297837

UEI: MLUBVUGJA1G9

Data as of August 21, 2026

THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK7 audit years3 findings
7
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 24, 2025, which was (240 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

2024-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Funding Agency: Department of Agriculture ALNs: 10.565, 10.568 & 10.569 Criteria Internal controls and other compliance knowledge should prevent the incorrect coding of employee hours worked. Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1), "charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" and "be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated." Condition Internal controls and adherence to compliance were not followed with regards to an appropriate level of approval of management that is charged to the Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds program and the Food Cluster Program. Questioned costs Total questioned cost of $2,822 based on three payroll transactions tested that were not approved at the appropriate level but were charged to the Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund grant (ALN 21.027). Total questioned cost of $3,475 based on three payroll transactions tested that were not approved at the appropriate level but were charged to the Food Cluster Program (ALNs 10.565, 10.568, & 10.569). Context During our payroll testing, of the six executive director timesheets tested, none of them indicated a review or approval from the board president. Cause The error was caused by not applying an adequate number of controls necessary for the executive director's timesheet. Effect The Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds program and Food Cluster program and other federal programs could be incorrectly charged with unreasonable wages.Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation We recommend that the board president or other board member designee review the executive director's timesheet prior to submitting the wages for reimbursement from federal grants.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Funding Agency: Department of Agriculture ALNs: 10.565, 10.568 & 10.569 Criteria Internal controls and other compliance knowledge should prevent the incorrect coding of employee hours worked. Per 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1), "charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" and "be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated." Condition Internal controls and adherence to compliance were not followed with regards to an appropriate level of approval of management that is charged to the Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds program and the Food Cluster Program. Questioned costs Total questioned cost of $2,822 based on three payroll transactions tested that were not approved at the appropriate level but were charged to the Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund grant (ALN 21.027). Total questioned cost of $3,475 based on three payroll transactions tested that were not approved at the appropriate level but were charged to the Food Cluster Program (ALNs 10.565, 10.568, & 10.569). Context During our payroll testing, of the six executive director timesheets tested, none of them indicated a review or approval from the board president. Cause The error was caused by not applying an adequate number of controls necessary for the executive director's timesheet. Effect The Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds program and Food Cluster program and other federal programs could be incorrectly charged with unreasonable wages.Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation We recommend that the board president or other board member designee review the executive director's timesheet prior to submitting the wages for reimbursement from federal grants.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-001: Internal controls and adherence to compliance were not followed with regards to an appropriate level of approval of management that is charged to the Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds and the Food Cluster Program. The Problem: CEO timesheets were not reviewed or approved by our Board of Directors in 2024 so proper oversight was not being done. Corrective Action: The procedure we had in place was that our Board Chairperson would review and approve our CEO timesheet entries each payroll period. This procedure was followed in prior years. In January 2024 the Chairperson changed to a new Chairperson and this person did not receive proper training on how to approve the CEO timesheet. When the auditors brought our attention to this situation in March of 2025, we immediately contacted the current and previous Board Chairs, HR Director, and Interim CEO. They worked together to train the present Board Chairperson on how to access the CEO timesheet entries, review them and approve them in a timely manner. This process is being used every pay period and our reports show that all timesheets are approved. We also printed out all timesheets going back to January and had the Board Chair review and sign those copies. Going forward we will be sure that proper training is done when there is a change in either the Board Chair or the CEO/Ed position.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
QUESTIONED COSTS

2024-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Internal controls and other compliance knowledge should provide adequate subrecipient monitoring under federal awards. Per 2 CFR 200.332(d), pass-through entities should "monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved." This would include site monitoring visits during the grant's period of performance. Condition The Organization provided funds to subrecipients under its direct award from the Department of Treasury. Payments to subrecipients are made on a reimbursement basis. Context During our subrecipient monitoring testing, we noted one of the three subrecipients tested did not receive a site visit during the grant agreement period. Per our discussion with management, the Organization was unable to schedule a monitoring visit during the grant agreement period. The Organization was also unable to provide sufficient documentation that supported adequate monitoring activities were in place during the grant agreement period. Cause The error was caused by the Organization's negligence to conduct any monitoring activity during the grant agreement period. Effect Unallowable activities or cost principles could be charged to the Department of Treasury. Repeat Finding No.Auditor's Recommendation It is recommended that the Organization reevaluates its internal controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that proper monitoring is occurring during the grant agreement period. The Organization should also consider who is responsible for the monitoring activity, and if necessary, assign those responsibilities to an employee who has a more flexible schedule that can accommodate the scheduled monitoring visits.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Internal controls and other compliance knowledge should provide adequate subrecipient monitoring under federal awards. Per 2 CFR 200.332(d), pass-through entities should "monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved." This would include site monitoring visits during the grant's period of performance. Condition The Organization provided funds to subrecipients under its direct award from the Department of Treasury. Payments to subrecipients are made on a reimbursement basis. Context During our subrecipient monitoring testing, we noted one of the three subrecipients tested did not receive a site visit during the grant agreement period. Per our discussion with management, the Organization was unable to schedule a monitoring visit during the grant agreement period. The Organization was also unable to provide sufficient documentation that supported adequate monitoring activities were in place during the grant agreement period. Cause The error was caused by the Organization's negligence to conduct any monitoring activity during the grant agreement period. Effect Unallowable activities or cost principles could be charged to the Department of Treasury. Repeat Finding No.Auditor's Recommendation It is recommended that the Organization reevaluates its internal controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that proper monitoring is occurring during the grant agreement period. The Organization should also consider who is responsible for the monitoring activity, and if necessary, assign those responsibilities to an employee who has a more flexible schedule that can accommodate the scheduled monitoring visits.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-002: TCFB was negligent in monitoring sub-recipients during the grant agreement period. The Problem: During testing, the auditors noted that one of the three sub-recipients tested did not receive a site visit during the grant agreement period. Established standard Three programs require sub-agency monitoring visits. EFAP (3 sub-agencies) requires each sub-agency to be monitored on site once each biennium (2 year agreement period). TEFAP (40 sub-agencies) requires that a minimum of 10% of sub-agencies be monitored on site once each year. CSFP (3 sub-agencies) requires each agency to be monitored on site once every 2 years. Actions to be taken - While the EFAP requirement was used for the test above, this plan will include monitoring visits for all 3 programs. - An additional staff member will be added to the contract team who will be responsible for on-site monitoring visits once trained. - Plan out which agencies should be visited in which years. - Create a shared calendar that includes the time period visits should take place in, when to reach out to sub-agencies to schedule visits, who will conduct visits. Action assignments - The entire contract team will work together to create the calendar. - Contracts Manager and Commodities Coordinator will plan out which sub-agencies to visit, and when to visit them. - Contracts Manager and new team member will schedule and conduct the first 2 site reviews, after which the new team member will take the lead with support from the others. Timeline - The additional contract team member will be added July 1st, 2025, but will be available for planning meetings before then. - Ordered list of sub-agency visits will be completed by the end of May 2025. - Shared calendar will be fully completed by the end of June 2025. Verify implementation - The Contracts Manager will report progress of monitoring visits to CEO/ED quarterly.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment

2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-003: TCFB was negligent in two areas for one of their purchases: No record of vendor verification that they were not suspended or disbarred and no WSDA prior approval for the purchase which was over $5,000. This was in violation of both their internal procedures and WSDA requirements. The Problem: During testing the auditors noted that one instance of purchasing using WSDA funds was made without WSDA prior approval and proper documentation of suspension and debarment or WSDA prior approval. Established Standard: Organization must verify SAM registration and conduct suspension, and debarment checks prior to entering into any sub-agency agreement, contract, purchase, or equipment repair over $5,000. It is recommended that lead agency verifies, at least annually, that sub agencies and vendors are not suspended or debarred. Information about suspension and debarment checks is to be entered onto a spreadsheet of approved vendors. When the lead agency enters into a covered transaction with another agency or vendor, lead agency must verify that the entity with whom business is transacted is registered with SAM and is not excluded or disqualified. There are two methods for verification: A. Checking SAM.GOV exclusions (this method requires saving a copy of the verification search) B. Collecting a signed certification from the vendor. Actions to be taken: • Updated training of TCFB staff on the Policy/Procedures for procurements using WSDA funding. • Create step-by-step instructions for purchases using WSDA funding. • Effective October 1, 2024 WSDA’s threshold for preapprovals changed to $10,000. We will update our purchasing policy to reflect this change. Action Assignments: • Instruction checklist will be created by lead purchaser. • Lead purchaser will ensure that any purchases follow the Policy/Procedures for procurement. • Lead purchaser will be responsible for documenting SAM registration, Suspension and Debarment check, and WSDA pre-approvals. The documentation will consist of a copy of the exclusions page on SAM.GOV, as well as a spreadsheet of approved vendors with a date of last check. Timeline: • Instruction checklist for purchases using WSDA funds will be created by July 1st, 2025. • A spreadsheet has already been created to capture the information concerning Suspension and Debarment checks. A separate folder contains copies of each entities exclusion page from SAM.GOV. Verify Implementation: • In July 2025 Lead Purchaser will submit to the Executive Director: A. A copy of step-by-step instruction checklist. B. A copy of the spreadsheet with Suspension and Debarment checks C. Copies of exclusion pages from SAM.GOV Finance Dept. will verify invoice have received WSDA prior Approvals

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Try tracking your findings and corrective action plans today — we're actively building this out and want your input on what an organization like yours actually needs.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.