WARDEN FARM HOMES, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 237056268

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: SQUIRES MADDUX & COMPANY, PLLC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

Data as of August 28, 2026

WARDEN FARM HOMES, INC.6 audit years2 findings1 repeat
6
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$753,724 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 28, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 28, 2022 (1583 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT

Sampled invoices included 2 out of 20 instances where past due balances were paid or payment documentation consisted of vendor statements and not invoices. We were unable to determine expense allowability based solely upon payments of overdue balances included with invoice payments or payments from vendor statements. Criteria: Best practices for activity level internal control over expenses requires payment to be made from original vendor invoices only, and not from vendor statements or invoiced past due balances. In addition, USDA-RD Regulation 2-3560 Attachment 4-A provides guidance about allowable Project expenditures; documentation evidencing allowability must be maintained by management for all disbursements. Cause: Although the management agent has a policy of paying from invoices only, that policy was not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect: Paying past due balances on invoices or payments based on vendor statements could result in overpayments to vendors. In addition, the Corporation cannot demonstrate compliance with USDA-RD Attachment 4-A of USDA-RD Handbook 2-3560 with respect to payments on past due balances paid to vendors. Only invoices contain enough detail to demonstrate and document such compliance. Auditor?s Recommendation: Management should reinstitute the requirement that all payments to vendors be made based upon vendor invoices only, and management should obtain copies of any past due invoices representing past due balances before payment is approved. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: After discussion with the auditor, the management agrees with the auditor?s recommendation and will reinstitute the policy of not paying vendors from statements or past due balances on invoices. FINDINGS ? FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT Finding No. 2021-002: Section 515(a) & 521, CFDA #10.427 & #10.415 Information on Universe Population Size: 25 Residential Units Sample Size Information: 5 Residential Units Tested Identification of Repeat Finding Reference Number: Finding 2020-001 Condition: 1. Assets are not being properly verified leading to income from assets not being properly included on the certifications on 4 out of 5 tenant files tested. 2. Rent was not correctly computed in 1 out of 5 files tested. Gross income computed by management was $21,060 but the actual gross income was $24,570, resulting in overpayment of rental assistance and undercharging the tenant for rent. Criteria: 1. Under USDA-RD Handbook 2-3560 Paragraph 6-10 Asset Evaluation, Verification and Inclusions on Certifications, applicants must provide information about household assets at the time of application and whenever an income is reverified. Applicants must provide sufficient information to enable the borrower to verify the asset information and compute the market and cash value of assets. 2. The amount used for calculating rent did not match the amount on the third-party verification that should have been used for the calculation of rent. Cause: Management has not designed proper internal controls over documenting household assets and related income from assets as part of their certification/recertification process. Management therefore is not making additional inquiries of tenants about the potential sources of assets associated with their verified income source when no assets are reported by tenants. For the error in calculating income previously noted in condition paragraph, management should use figures from third-party verifications when calculating gross income. Effect or Potential Effect: Income from assets and rent calculations can affect an applicant?s ability to be qualified as an eligible tenant and determining the amount due for rent and rental assistance. Many types of assets generate income that must be included in the calculations of annual income that determine tenant rent and assistance. Because the full scope of missing assets is unknown, the amount of misstatement could not be determined, but the amount could be significant. Improper rent calculations led to overpayment of rental assistance and undercharging of tenant rent. Context: We sampled 5 of 25 tenant files and in 4 out of 5 files tested, assets were not properly verified despite tenant sources of income provided indication that they do have assets such as bank accounts, debit or prepaid cards or cash on hand. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend developing controls to ensure that asset verification and proper income calculation is an integral part of the income verification process. We would recommend re-training of site management on USDA-RD occupancy regulations and consistent oversight, continued future training and review of every certification processed to ensure correct internal controls are in operation for continued compliance. Reporting of Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor?s finding and will provide retraining of site management with regard to proper verification of tenant assets and ensure that all assets are identified and properly included in the income calculation of rent. In addition, all future rent calculations will be based upon third-party verifications. We will design controls to review and approve income calculations at the management office prior to implementation to prevent calculation errors.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2021-001 Information on Universe Population Size: 209 Repairs and Maintenance Invoices Representing $28,287 in Costs Sample Size Information: 20 Repairs and Maintenance Invoices Tested Representing $21,388 in Costs Tested Identification of Repeat Finding Reference Number: Not Applicable Condition: Sampled invoices included 2 out of 20 instances where past due balances were paid or payment documentation consisted of vendor statements and not invoices. We were unable to determine expense allowability based solely upon payments of overdue balances included with invoice payments or payments from vendor statements. Criteria: Best practices for activity level internal control over expenses requires payment to be made from original vendor invoices only, and not from vendor statements or invoiced past due balances. In addition, USDA-RD Regulation 2-3560 Attachment 4-A provides guidance about allowable Project expenditures; documentation evidencing allowability must be maintained by management for all disbursements. Cause: Although the management agent has a policy of paying from invoices only, that policy was not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect: Paying past due balances on invoices or payments based on vendor statements could result in overpayments to vendors. In addition, the Corporation cannot demonstrate compliance with USDA-RD Attachment 4-A of USDA-RD Handbook 2-3560 with respect to payments on past due balances paid to vendors. Only invoices contain enough detail to demonstrate and document such compliance. Auditor?s Recommendation: Management should reinstitute the requirement that all payments to vendors be made based upon vendor invoices only, and management should obtain copies of any past due invoices representing past due balances before payment is approved. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: After discussion with the auditor, the management agrees with the auditor?s recommendation and will reinstitute the policy of not paying vendors from statements or past due balances on invoices. FINDINGS ? FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT Finding No. 2021-002: Section 515(a) & 521, CFDA #10.427 & #10.415 Information on Universe Population Size: 25 Residential Units Sample Size Information: 5 Residential Units Tested Identification of Repeat Finding Reference Number: Finding 2020-001 Condition: 1. Assets are not being properly verified leading to income from assets not being properly included on the certifications on 4 out of 5 tenant files tested. 2. Rent was not correctly computed in 1 out of 5 files tested. Gross income computed by management was $21,060 but the actual gross income was $24,570, resulting in overpayment of rental assistance and undercharging the tenant for rent. Criteria: 1. Under USDA-RD Handbook 2-3560 Paragraph 6-10 Asset Evaluation, Verification and Inclusions on Certifications, applicants must provide information about household assets at the time of application and whenever an income is reverified. Applicants must provide sufficient information to enable the borrower to verify the asset information and compute the market and cash value of assets. 2. The amount used for calculating rent did not match the amount on the third-party verification that should have been used for the calculation of rent. Cause: Management has not designed proper internal controls over documenting household assets and related income from assets as part of their certification/recertification process. Management therefore is not making additional inquiries of tenants about the potential sources of assets associated with their verified income source when no assets are reported by tenants. For the error in calculating income previously noted in condition paragraph, management should use figures from third-party verifications when calculating gross income. Effect or Potential Effect: Income from assets and rent calculations can affect an applicant?s ability to be qualified as an eligible tenant and determining the amount due for rent and rental assistance. Many types of assets generate income that must be included in the calculations of annual income that determine tenant rent and assistance. Because the full scope of missing assets is unknown, the amount of misstatement could not be determined, but the amount could be significant. Improper rent calculations led to overpayment of rental assistance and undercharging of tenant rent. Context: We sampled 5 of 25 tenant files and in 4 out of 5 files tested, assets were not properly verified despite tenant sources of income provided indication that they do have assets such as bank accounts, debit or prepaid cards or cash on hand. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend developing controls to ensure that asset verification and proper income calculation is an integral part of the income verification process. We would recommend re-training of site management on USDA-RD occupancy regulations and consistent oversight, continued future training and review of every certification processed to ensure correct internal controls are in operation for continued compliance. Reporting of Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor?s finding and will provide retraining of site management with regard to proper verification of tenant assets and ensure that all assets are identified and properly included in the income calculation of rent. In addition, all future rent calculations will be based upon third-party verifications. We will design controls to review and approve income calculations at the management office prior to implementation to prevent calculation errors.

Corrective Action Plan

United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Auditee identification number: 56-13-184526024 Audit Firm: Squires Maddux & Company, PLLC 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 270 Edmonds, WA 98020 Period covered by the audit: Fiscal Year Ended: June 30, 2021 Prepared by: Contact Person First Name: Ryan Contact Person Last Name: Enright Contact Email Address: ryan@landmarkcw.com FINDINGS ? FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT Finding No. 2021-001 Condition: 1. Assets are not being properly verified leading to income from assets not being properly included on the certifications on 4 out of 5 tenant files tested. 2. Rent was not correctly computed in 1 out of 5 files tested. Gross income computed by management was $21,060 but the actual gross income was $24,570, resulting in overpayment of rental assistance and undercharging the tenant for rent. Auditor?s Recommendation: Management should reinstitute the requirement that all payments to vendors be made based upon vendor invoices only, and management should obtain copies of any past due invoices representing past due balances before payment is approved. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: After discussion with the auditor, the management agrees with the auditor?s recommendation and will reinstitute the policy of not paying vendors from statements or past due balances on invoices. FINDINGS ? MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT Finding No. 2021-002: Section 515(a) & 521, CFDA #10.427 & #10.415 Condition: 1. Assets are not being properly verified, leading to income from assets not being properly included on the certifications on 4 out of 5 tenant files tested. 2. Rent was not correctly computed in 1 out of 5 files tested. Gross income computed by management was $21,060 but the actual gross income was $24,570, resulting in overpayment of rental assistance and undercharging the tenant for rent. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend developing controls to ensure that asset verification and proper income calculation is an integral part of the income verification process. We would recommend re-training of site management on USDA-RD occupancy regulations and consistent oversight, continued future training and review of every certification processed to ensure correct internal controls are in operation for continued compliance. Reporting of Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor?s finding and will provide retraining of site management with regard to proper verification of tenant assets and ensure that all assets are identified and properly included in the income calculation of rent. In addition, all future rent calculations will be based upon third-party verifications. We will design controls to review and approve income calculations at the management office prior to implementation to prevent calculation errors. Respectfully submitted by: __________________________________ Landmark Management Central Washington LLC Ryan Enright, Portfolio Manager

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Eligibility →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$806,633 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2020 — management decision was due May 30, 2021.

2020-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

1. Assets were not declared by the households in 5 of 5 tenant files reviewed; 2. No assets are being verified or included on the certifications. Criteria: Under USDA-RD Handbook 2-3560 Paragraph 6-10 Asset Evaluation, Verification and Inclusions on Certifications, applicants must provide information about household assets at the time of application and whenever an income is reverified. Applicants must provide sufficient information to enable the borrower to verify the asset information and compute the market and cash value of the asset. Cause: Management has not designed proper internal controls over documenting household assets and related income from assets as part of their certification/recertification process. Management therefore is not making additional inquiries of tenants about the potential sources of assets associated with their verified income source when no assets are reported by tenants. Effect or Potential Effect: Assets can affect an applicant?s ability to be qualified as an eligible tenant and determining rent and rental assistance. Many types of assets generate income that must be included in the calculations of annual income that determine tenant rent and assistance. Because the full scope of missing assets is unknown, the amount of misstatement could not be determined, but the amount could be significant. Context: We sampled 5 of 25 tenant files and in every case, no assets were declared despite tenant sources of income provided indication that they do have assets such as bank accounts, debit or prepaid cards or cash on hand. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend developing controls to ensure that asset verification is an integral part of income verification. We would recommend re-training of site management on USDA-RD occupancy regulations and consistent oversight, continued future training and review of every certification processed to ensure correct internal controls are in operation for continued compliance. Reporting of Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor?s finding and will provide retraining of site management with regard to proper inquiry of tenants about disclosure of assets and ensure that all assets are identified and properly included in the income calculation of rent. In addition, we will design controls to ensure ongoing compliance with the identification and calculation of income associated with assets.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDINGS ? FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT NONE. FINDINGS ? FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT Finding No. 2020-001: Section 515(a) & 521, CFDA #10.427 & #10.415 Condition: 1. Assets were not declared by the households in 5 of 5 tenant files reviewed; 2. No assets are being verified or included on the certifications. Criteria: Under USDA-RD Handbook 2-3560 Paragraph 6-10 Asset Evaluation, Verification and Inclusions on Certifications, applicants must provide information about household assets at the time of application and whenever an income is reverified. Applicants must provide sufficient information to enable the borrower to verify the asset information and compute the market and cash value of the asset. Cause: Management has not designed proper internal controls over documenting household assets and related income from assets as part of their certification/recertification process. Management therefore is not making additional inquiries of tenants about the potential sources of assets associated with their verified income source when no assets are reported by tenants. Effect or Potential Effect: Assets can affect an applicant?s ability to be qualified as an eligible tenant and determining rent and rental assistance. Many types of assets generate income that must be included in the calculations of annual income that determine tenant rent and assistance. Because the full scope of missing assets is unknown, the amount of misstatement could not be determined, but the amount could be significant. Context: We sampled 5 of 25 tenant files and in every case, no assets were declared despite tenant sources of income provided indication that they do have assets such as bank accounts, debit or prepaid cards or cash on hand. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend developing controls to ensure that asset verification is an integral part of income verification. We would recommend re-training of site management on USDA-RD occupancy regulations and consistent oversight, continued future training and review of every certification processed to ensure correct internal controls are in operation for continued compliance. Reporting of Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor?s finding and will provide retraining of site management with regard to proper inquiry of tenants about disclosure of assets and ensure that all assets are identified and properly included in the income calculation of rent. In addition, we will design controls to ensure ongoing compliance with the identification and calculation of income associated with assets.

Corrective Action Plan

United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Auditee identification number: 56-13-184526024 Audit Firm: Squires Maddux & Company, PLLC 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 270 Edmonds, WA 98020 Period covered by the audit: Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Prepared by: Contact Person First Name: Ryan Contact Person Last Name: Enright Contact Email Address: ryan@landmarkcw.com FINDINGS ? FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT NONE. FINDINGS ? MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT Condition: 1. Assets were not declared by the households in 5 of 5 tenant files reviewed; 2. No assets are being verified or included on the certifications. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend developing controls to ensure that asset verification is an integral part of income verification. We would recommend re-training of site management on USDA-RD occupancy regulations and consistent oversight, continued future training and review of every certification processed to ensure correct internal controls are in operation for continued compliance. Reporting of Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor?s finding and will provide retraining of site management with regard to proper inquiry of tenants about disclosure of assets and ensure that all assets are identified and properly included in the income calculation of rent. In addition, we will design controls to ensure ongoing compliance with the identification and calculation of income associated with assets. Respectfully submitted by: __________________________________ Landmark Management Ryan Enright, Portfolio Manager

About Eligibility →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.