EIN: 232480701
UEI: KLD1L3GC9NA5
Data as of August 24, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 11, 2025 (532 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Finding 2023-003 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Major Program - Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Program Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: N/A Award Year: Period 4 reporting period Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Criteria: As outlined in Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623, funds are appropriated to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally, for necessary expenses to reimburse, through grants or other mechanisms, eligible health care providers for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. That funds appropriated under this paragraph in this Act shall be available for building or construction of temporary structures, leasing of properties, medical supplies and equipment, including personal protective equipment and testing supplies, increased workforce and trainings, emergency operation centers, retrofitting facilities and surge capacity. Uniform Guidance requires that charges to federal awards must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal controls that provide reasonable assurance about the accuracy, allowability and proper allocation of the charges. Support should be maintained for the distribution of an employee’s salary and wages among specific activities or cost objective if the employee works on multiple activities. Condition and Context: During our testing, we noted that 2 expenditure samples out of 11 tested for non-salary expenses had invoices that were for allowable expenses, but the total invoices exceeded the amount submitted for the PRF grant but there was no support for the proper allocation of the charges between grant expenditures and non-grant expenditures. There was also one employee that had her salary per the payroll register that exceeded the amount reported for salaries in the PRF reporting for each pay, but there was no documentation maintained for the distribution of the employee’s salary and wages among specific activities or cost. (30 samples were tested and 6 were noted as not supported as the allocation which all related to the one employee). This was not a statistically valid sample. Effect: Although the underlying expenses are allowable expenditures under the Grant, the documentation was not maintained to document the methodology to allocate these specific items as required by Uniform Guidance, therefore this is considered a significant deficiency in internal controls. Questioned Cost: None Cause: With turnover at the Center, management was not able to locate the documentation to support the allocations for the items listed above in Condition and Context. Esperanza Health Center, Inc. and Controlled Entity Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2023 37 Recommendation: We recommend that management review the procedures for allocating cost to grants and ensure proper documentation be maintained for allowability and proper allocation of the charges to grants. This includes that support should be maintained for the distribution of an employee’s salary and wages among specific activities or cost objective if the employee works on multiple activities. We also recommend that an independent reviewer signs and dates for evidence of the review of the cost worksheets used for reporting federal grants. View of Responsible Officials: Based on the perspectives provided by management and officials, the finance department has initiated specific corrective measures to ensure strict adherence to reporting PRF and centralization of documentation. As our organization expands, we will evaluate our documentation processes to create clear standard operating procedures (SOPs). We have employed a grants analyst who will define distinct responsibilities for grants reporting, establish a central repository, and reconcile both FTE and non-FTE expenditures and receipts, including cash receipts, drawdowns and invoice allocation. Project codes will be crucial in driving this process within our financial system, Blackbaud. Management will report on progress of these actions to the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors at its monthly meetings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-003 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Major Program - Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Program Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: N/A Award Year: Period 4 reporting period Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Criteria: As outlined in Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623, funds are appropriated to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally, for necessary expenses to reimburse, through grants or other mechanisms, eligible health care providers for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. That funds appropriated under this paragraph in this Act shall be available for building or construction of temporary structures, leasing of properties, medical supplies and equipment, including personal protective equipment and testing supplies, increased workforce and trainings, emergency operation centers, retrofitting facilities and surge capacity. Uniform Guidance requires that charges to federal awards must be based on records that are supported by a system of internal controls that provide reasonable assurance about the accuracy, allowability and proper allocation of the charges. Support should be maintained for the distribution of an employee’s salary and wages among specific activities or cost objective if the employee works on multiple activities. Condition and Context: During our testing, we noted that 2 expenditure samples out of 11 tested for non-salary expenses had invoices that were for allowable expenses, but the total invoices exceeded the amount submitted for the PRF grant but there was no support for the proper allocation of the charges between grant expenditures and non-grant expenditures. There was also one employee that had her salary per the payroll register that exceeded the amount reported for salaries in the PRF reporting for each pay, but there was no documentation maintained for the distribution of the employee’s salary and wages among specific activities or cost. (30 samples were tested and 6 were noted as not supported as the allocation which all related to the one employee). This was not a statistically valid sample. Effect: Although the underlying expenses are allowable expenditures under the Grant, the documentation was not maintained to document the methodology to allocate these specific items as required by Uniform Guidance, therefore this is considered a significant deficiency in internal controls. Questioned Cost: None Cause: With turnover at the Center, management was not able to locate the documentation to support the allocations for the items listed above in Condition and Context. Esperanza Health Center, Inc. and Controlled Entity Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2023 37 Recommendation: We recommend that management review the procedures for allocating cost to grants and ensure proper documentation be maintained for allowability and proper allocation of the charges to grants. This includes that support should be maintained for the distribution of an employee’s salary and wages among specific activities or cost objective if the employee works on multiple activities. We also recommend that an independent reviewer signs and dates for evidence of the review of the cost worksheets used for reporting federal grants. View of Responsible Officials: Based on the perspectives provided by management and officials, the finance department has initiated specific corrective measures to ensure strict adherence to reporting PRF and centralization of documentation. As our organization expands, we will evaluate our documentation processes to create clear standard operating procedures (SOPs). We have employed a grants analyst who will define distinct responsibilities for grants reporting, establish a central repository, and reconcile both FTE and non-FTE expenditures and receipts, including cash receipts, drawdowns and invoice allocation. Project codes will be crucial in driving this process within our financial system, Blackbaud. Management will report on progress of these actions to the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors at its monthly meetings.
View of Responsible Officials: Based on the perspectives provided by management and officials, the finance department has initiated specific corrective measures to ensure strict adherence to reporting PRF and centralization of documentation. As our organization expands, we will evaluate our documentation processes to create clear standard operating procedures (SOPs). We have employed a grants analyst who will define distinct responsibilities for grants reporting, establish a central repository, and reconcile both FTE and non-FTE expenditures and receipts, including cash receipts, drawdowns and invoice allocation. Project codes will be crucial in driving this process within our financial system, Blackbaud. Management will report on progress of these actions to the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors at its monthly meetings.
FAC accepted this audit on June 1, 2022 — management decision was due December 1, 2022.
The quarterly expenditure report for March 31, 2021 which was due on April 30, 2021 was not filed until May 24, 2021. Also, the supporting documentation for the information included in the performance tri-annual report due on November 30, 2020 was not maintained and when the metrics were rerun there were small differences in the number of visits and tests performed. Context: Our population included all expenditure and performance reporting. Our sample included seven reporting entries. This was not a statistically valid sample. Effect: The quarterly report was not filed timely and for the performance report the support was not maintained that it could be accessed on a timely basis. Cause: Staffing issues at the client. Recommendation: The Center should have procedures in place to ensure that reports are completed accurately in accordance with requirements and filed timely and the supporting documentation should be maintained.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.224/93.527 (COVID and Non COVID) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Center Program Cluster Federal Award Number: H80CS06644/ H8CCS35216/ H8DCS36652/ H8ECS38942/ H8FCS40731 Federal Award Year: Various Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Criteria: The Center is required to submit quarterly expenditure reports and performance reports within allowed award limits within 30 days of the end of the quarter. Questioned Cost: None Condition: The quarterly expenditure report for March 31, 2021 which was due on April 30, 2021 was not filed until May 24, 2021. Also, the supporting documentation for the information included in the performance tri-annual report due on November 30, 2020 was not maintained and when the metrics were rerun there were small differences in the number of visits and tests performed. Context: Our population included all expenditure and performance reporting. Our sample included seven reporting entries. This was not a statistically valid sample. Effect: The quarterly report was not filed timely and for the performance report the support was not maintained that it could be accessed on a timely basis. Cause: Staffing issues at the client. Recommendation: The Center should have procedures in place to ensure that reports are completed accurately in accordance with requirements and filed timely and the supporting documentation should be maintained.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The quarterly expenditure report in question was less than a month late, did not cause any disruption and is no longer used by federal financial officials. Despite staffing challenges, the tri-annual performance report was able to be replicated nearly 18 months later within our data systems with only very slight differences. While we maintain files for performance reporting, we will review our filing system to ensure complete record keeping for supporting reports which are independent of specific staffing. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Jake Becker, Chief Administrative Officer Completion Date: August 31, 2022
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.