EIN: 232220051
UEI: UHYPF5CN5JM7
Data as of August 23, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 10, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 10, 2027 (171 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During fiscal year 2025, iDE passed federal funds to subrecipients under active federal awards that remained operational during a portion of the year prior to the termination of the underlying grant agreements. Although iDE reviewed subrecipient liquidation reports and reimbursement requests supporting expenditures incurred prior to award termination, iDE did not perform or document formal subrecipient risk assessments. Further, because risk assessments were not performed, iDE did not establish or implement monitoring procedures commensurate with assessed risk, such as documented reviews of performance information, follow-up on compliance matters, review of Single Audit reports, or other monitoring activities required by Uniform Guidance. Cause: Employee turnover and terminated programs. Effect: Inadequate procedures and controls for subrecipient monitoring could result in material noncompliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, or award terms and conditions. Repeat finding: Yes—see Finding 2024-002. Questioned costs: None
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-001: Subrecipient Monitoring Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance Federal Program: USAID Foreign Assistance for Program Overseas (ALN 98.001) Federal Awarding Agency: United States Agency for International Development Awards: • Direct award: Resilient Coastal Community – 72065622CA00010 • Direct award: Urban Sanitation Activity – 72068724CA00001 • Pass-Through from UC Davis – A23-3500-S001 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 lists requirements for pass-through entities to perform as part of the subrecipient monitoring compliance requirement. This includes performing an evaluation of fraud risk and risk of noncompliance with a subaward to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. 2 CFR 200.303 states that a receipt or subrecipient of federal awards must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During fiscal year 2025, iDE passed federal funds to subrecipients under active federal awards that remained operational during a portion of the year prior to the termination of the underlying grant agreements. Although iDE reviewed subrecipient liquidation reports and reimbursement requests supporting expenditures incurred prior to award termination, iDE did not perform or document formal subrecipient risk assessments. Further, because risk assessments were not performed, iDE did not establish or implement monitoring procedures commensurate with assessed risk, such as documented reviews of performance information, follow-up on compliance matters, review of Single Audit reports, or other monitoring activities required by Uniform Guidance. Cause: Employee turnover and terminated programs. Effect: Inadequate procedures and controls for subrecipient monitoring could result in material noncompliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, or award terms and conditions. Repeat finding: Yes—see Finding 2024-002. Questioned costs: None
Identifying Number: 2025-001 Subrecipient Monitoring Controls Finding: During fiscal year 2025, iDE passed federal funds to subrecipients under active federal awards that remained operational during a portion of the year prior to the termination of the underlying grant agreements. Although iDE reviewed subrecipient liquidation reports and reimbursement requests supporting expenditures incurred prior to award termination, iDE did not perform or document formal subrecipient risk assessments. Further, because risk assessments were not performed, iDE did not establish or implement monitoring procedures commensurate with assessed risk, such as documented reviews of performance information, follow-up on compliance matters, review of Single Audit reports, or other monitoring activities required by Uniform Guidance. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Name of Responsible Official: Melanie Mackintosh, Controller Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: 1. Following the 2024 subrecipient monitoring finding, iDE created an updated subrecipient monitoring policy and sponsored global trainings. 2. There was no opportunity for correction of subrecipient monitoring of USAID grants in 2025 due to the USAID shutdown.
2024-002
FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2025 — management decision was due February 13, 2026.
There is no internal control in place over Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting submissions, which is a direct and material compliance requirement over USAID federal awards. Context: The lack of control in place over FFATA submissions did not result in any instances of noncompliance with FFATA reporting requirements. The lack of an internal control in place over FFATA submissions resulted in a significant deficiency in internal controls over the FFATA compliance requirement due to potential for future noncompliance. Cause: Policies and procedures documents do not include controls for FFATA report submissions. Effect: The lack of control around FFATA submissions could result in missed reporting requirements resulting in potential delays in award processing and discontinued funding. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding? No Recommendation: We recommend management implement a control over FFATA submissions that includes evidence of that control taking place (signature, email approval, etc.). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024 – 001: FFATA Controls Significant Deficiency Federal Program: USAID Foreign Assistance for Program Overseas (ALN 98.001) Federal Awarding Agency: United States Agency for International Development Awards: • Direct award: Resilient Coastal Community – 72065622CA00010 • Direct award: Urban Sanitation Activity – 72068724CA00001 • Pass-Through from UC Davis – A23-3500-S001 • Pass-Through from Project Concern International – PCI-1203-SG-1600 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states that a receipt or subrecipient of federal awards must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: There is no internal control in place over Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting submissions, which is a direct and material compliance requirement over USAID federal awards. Context: The lack of control in place over FFATA submissions did not result in any instances of noncompliance with FFATA reporting requirements. The lack of an internal control in place over FFATA submissions resulted in a significant deficiency in internal controls over the FFATA compliance requirement due to potential for future noncompliance. Cause: Policies and procedures documents do not include controls for FFATA report submissions. Effect: The lack of control around FFATA submissions could result in missed reporting requirements resulting in potential delays in award processing and discontinued funding. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding? No Recommendation: We recommend management implement a control over FFATA submissions that includes evidence of that control taking place (signature, email approval, etc.). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Identifying Number: 2024-001: FFATA Controls Finding: There is no internal control in place over Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting submissions, which is a direct and material compliance requirement over USAID federal awards. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Name of Responsible Official: John Passauer, Vice President of Finance Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: 1. Provide training on Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting submissions for all Country Directors, grant program managers and Finance Directors. 2. Monitor ongoing compliance on a quarterly basis for any remaining active grants.
Weaknesses were found in federal subrecipient controls and monitoring during 2024. Context: For each of the six subrecipients selected for testing, the documentation within the 2024 monitoring tracker tool was incomplete, as certain monitoring procedures conducted were not fully recorded and reviewed in the tracker as required by iDE policies. Additionally, one subrecipient underwent a site visit that was not formally documented in a monitoring visit report, resulting in the absence of any record indicating a review had occurred. Overall, subrecipient risk assessments were inconsistently evaluated, leading to insufficient focus on high-risk subrecipients relative to those considered low risk. Cause: Employee turnover and personnel constraints. Effect: Inadequate procedures and controls for subrecipient monitoring may result in noncompliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, or award terms and conditions. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding? No Recommendation: Management may consider reviewing existing controls over subrecipient monitoring to evaluate their effectiveness in supporting iDE's compliance with 2 CFR 200 requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024 – 002: Subrecipient Monitoring Significant Deficiency Federal Program: USAID Foreign Assistance for Program Overseas (ALN 98.001) Federal Awarding Agency: United States Agency for International Development Awards: • Direct award: Resilient Coastal Community – 72065622CA00010 • Direct award: Urban Sanitation Activity – 72068724CA00001 • Pass-Through from UC Davis – A23-3500-S001 • Pass-Through from Project Concern International – PCI-1203-SG-1600 • Direct award: Reducing Post Harvest Losses through Access to New Technologies - 720BHA22CA00020 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 lists requirements for pass-through entities to perform as part of the subrecipient monitoring compliance requirement. This includes performing an evaluation of fraud risk and risk of noncompliance with a subaward to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the overall performance of a subrecipient to ensure that the goals and objectives of the subaward are achieved. 2 CFR 200.303 states that a receipt or subrecipient of federal awards must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Weaknesses were found in federal subrecipient controls and monitoring during 2024. Context: For each of the six subrecipients selected for testing, the documentation within the 2024 monitoring tracker tool was incomplete, as certain monitoring procedures conducted were not fully recorded and reviewed in the tracker as required by iDE policies. Additionally, one subrecipient underwent a site visit that was not formally documented in a monitoring visit report, resulting in the absence of any record indicating a review had occurred. Overall, subrecipient risk assessments were inconsistently evaluated, leading to insufficient focus on high-risk subrecipients relative to those considered low risk. Cause: Employee turnover and personnel constraints. Effect: Inadequate procedures and controls for subrecipient monitoring may result in noncompliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, or award terms and conditions. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding? No Recommendation: Management may consider reviewing existing controls over subrecipient monitoring to evaluate their effectiveness in supporting iDE's compliance with 2 CFR 200 requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Identifying Number: 2024-002 Subrecipient Monitoring Controls Finding: Weaknesses were found in federal subrecipient controls and monitoring during 2024. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Name of Responsible Official: John Passauer, Vice President of Finance Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: 1. Review and refine current grant policies to more clearly outline the roles and responsibilities with respect to subrecipient monitoring 2. Provide training on the new policy for all Country Directors, grant program managers and Finance Directors. 3. Monitor ongoing compliance with the new policy on a quarterly basis.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.