EIN: 231352118
UEI: ZLMFS3959KT3
Data as of August 23, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 3, 2025 (416 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Certain students’ enrollment information was not reported accurately or timely to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing we noted that in our sample of 11 students, 1 was not reported to NSLDS. Cause: The unreported student appeared on an SSCR Error Report (Error Code 75) but was not reported due to the unresolved error. Effect: Incorrect reporting to the NSLDS can lead to errors in determining the start of students' grace periods. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College to review its procedures for transmitting accurate information to the NSLDS. Furthermore, we suggest that the College establish a process to enhance oversight of the submissions completed by the third-party servicer. Views of Responsible Officers and Corrective Action Plan: Please refer to JEVS Human Services and Affiliates’ Corrective Action Plan
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Uniform Guidance Requirement: Special Tests Criteria: According to U.S. Department of Education (ED) regulations, all schools participating or approved to participate in Federal Student Aid programs must have an arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through a roster file. Schools are required to report enrollment status at both the school and program levels. They must report changes in a student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date. An academic program is defined by the combination of the school’s Office of Postsecondary Education Identification (OPEID) number, the program’s Classification of Instructional Program (CIP) code, credential level, and published program length. The Department of Education requires the University to report changes in enrollment status and specify the date that these changes occurred (34 CFR 685.309). Changes in enrollment status must be reported within 30 days. However, if a roster file is expected within 60 days, this date may be provided on that roster file. ED requires institutions to report changes in enrollment status within the determined time frame of 30 or 60 days (34 CFR 682.610). Condition: Certain students’ enrollment information was not reported accurately or timely to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing we noted that in our sample of 11 students, 1 was not reported to NSLDS. Cause: The unreported student appeared on an SSCR Error Report (Error Code 75) but was not reported due to the unresolved error. Effect: Incorrect reporting to the NSLDS can lead to errors in determining the start of students' grace periods. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College to review its procedures for transmitting accurate information to the NSLDS. Furthermore, we suggest that the College establish a process to enhance oversight of the submissions completed by the third-party servicer. Views of Responsible Officers and Corrective Action Plan: Please refer to JEVS Human Services and Affiliates’ Corrective Action Plan
JEVS HUMAN SERVICES AND AFFILIATES CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 FINDINGS – FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDITS U.S. Department of Education 2024-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Student Financial Aid Cluster: 84.063 – Federal Pell Grant Program 84.268 – Federal Direct Student Loans Condition: Certain students’ enrollment information was not reported accurately or timely to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Recommendation: We recommend the College to review its procedures for transmitting accurate information to the NSLDS. Furthermore, we suggest that the College establish a process to enhance oversight of the submissions completed by the third-party servicer. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Finding There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The College has reviewed and updated policies and procedures on reporting enrollment. A new procedure had been added to the process, requiring a designated employee to check and review on a weekly basis the Student Status Confirmation Report (SSCR) on the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) SSCR Error Correction Platform. The designated employee will document the review and resolution of items identified on the error report. This ensures that any errors are resolved within ten days of receipt, as required by the Department of Education for all schools receiving and distributing Title IV Aid. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024
During the audit, we noted JEVS Human Services has gaps within their written information security program and policies when compared to the Safeguards Rule. Questioned Costs: None Context: The GLBA Safeguard rules requires an organization to document the following within their written information security plan: (1) how the institution regularly tests or otherwise monitors the effectiveness of the safeguards it has implemented, (2) Provides for the implementation of policies and procedures to ensure that personnel are able to enact the information security program, and (3) Addresses how the institution will oversee its information system service providers. While evidence of these three safeguards' occurrence was provided to us during the audit, they were not documented within the written information security plan as required by GLBA. Cause: The Agency does have policies and controls that address potential risks; however, the risk assessment was not documented. Effect: Failure to comply with the GLBA standards puts the Agency at risk of compromising student personal information. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management continue to evaluate its written information security plan and establish the required documentation in accordance with GLBA safeguard rules. Views of Responsible Officers and Corrective Action Plan: Please refer to JEVS Human Services and Affiliates’ Corrective Action Plan
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education (ED) Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Uniform Guidance Requirement: Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). The Federal Trade Commission considers Title IV-eligible institutions that participate in Title IV Educational Assistance Programs as “financial institutions” and subject to the Gramm Leach-Bliley Act because they appear to be significantly engaged in wiring funds to consumers (16 CFR 313.3(k)(2)(vi)). Institutions agree to comply with GLBA in their Program Participation Agreement with ED. Institutions must protect student financial aid information, with particular attention to information provided to institutions by ED or otherwise obtained in support of the administration of the Federal student financial aid programs (16 CFR 314.3; HEA 483(a)(3)(E) and HEA 485B(d)(2)). Condition: During the audit, we noted JEVS Human Services has gaps within their written information security program and policies when compared to the Safeguards Rule. Questioned Costs: None Context: The GLBA Safeguard rules requires an organization to document the following within their written information security plan: (1) how the institution regularly tests or otherwise monitors the effectiveness of the safeguards it has implemented, (2) Provides for the implementation of policies and procedures to ensure that personnel are able to enact the information security program, and (3) Addresses how the institution will oversee its information system service providers. While evidence of these three safeguards' occurrence was provided to us during the audit, they were not documented within the written information security plan as required by GLBA. Cause: The Agency does have policies and controls that address potential risks; however, the risk assessment was not documented. Effect: Failure to comply with the GLBA standards puts the Agency at risk of compromising student personal information. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management continue to evaluate its written information security plan and establish the required documentation in accordance with GLBA safeguard rules. Views of Responsible Officers and Corrective Action Plan: Please refer to JEVS Human Services and Affiliates’ Corrective Action Plan
JEVS HUMAN SERVICES AND AFFILIATES CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 FINDINGS – FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDITS (CONTINUED) U.S. Department of Education 2024-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Student Financial Aid Cluster: 84.007 - Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants 84.063 – Federal Pell Grant Program 84.268 – Federal Direct Student Loans Condition: During the audit, we noted JEVS Human Service has gaps within their Written Information Security Program and policies when compared to the Safeguards Rule. Recommendation: We recommend management continue to evaluate its written information security plan and establish the required documentation in accordance with GLBA safeguard rules. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Finding There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will evaluate its written information security plan and establish the required documentation in accordance with GLBA safeguard rules. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 31, 2025
FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2021 — management decision was due June 26, 2022.
While the Agency has documented an individual responsible for coordinating the information security program and documented various safeguards and controls in place; the Agency has not documented a risk assessment that shows identified risks and the related safeguards in place. Questioned Costs: None Context: In discussions with management, risk assessments are performed at the Agency, however they were not documented. Written policies and procedure representing safeguards were documented in relation to identified risks. Cause: The Agency does have policies and controls that address potential risks; however, the risk assessment was not documented. Effect: Failure to comply with the GLBA standards puts the Agency at risk of compromising student personal information. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency ensure that the risk assessments performed are documented and include safeguards for each identified risk. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See attached corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-001 ? Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.007 ? Supplementary Educations Opportunity Grant; 84.033 ? Work Study Program; 84.063 ? Federal Pell Grant; 84.268 ? Direct Student Loans Award Period: July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with Title IV regulations, an institution of higher education is required to designate an individual to coordinate the information security program, perform a risk assessment that addresses (1) employee training and management; (2) information systems, including network and software design, as well as information processing, storage, transmission and disposal; and (3) detecting, preventing and responding to attacks, intrusions, or other systems failures, and document safeguards for identified risks (CFR 314.1(b)). Condition: While the Agency has documented an individual responsible for coordinating the information security program and documented various safeguards and controls in place; the Agency has not documented a risk assessment that shows identified risks and the related safeguards in place. Questioned Costs: None Context: In discussions with management, risk assessments are performed at the Agency, however they were not documented. Written policies and procedure representing safeguards were documented in relation to identified risks. Cause: The Agency does have policies and controls that address potential risks; however, the risk assessment was not documented. Effect: Failure to comply with the GLBA standards puts the Agency at risk of compromising student personal information. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency ensure that the risk assessments performed are documented and include safeguards for each identified risk. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See attached corrective action plan.
U.S. Department of Education JEVS Human Services respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2021 Audit period: June 30, 2021 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS?FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS U.S. Department of Education 2021-001 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency ensure that the risk assessments performed are documented and include safeguards for each identified risk Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Agency will document the risk assessments performed including the safeguards for each identified risk. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Bill McKeown Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 3/31/22 If the U.S. Department of Education has questions regarding this plan, please call Bill McKeown at 215-854-1863
FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2018 — management decision was due June 17, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.