PENNSYLVANIA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION

EIN: 231340051

UEI: KNP3JEK96X49

Data as of August 25, 2026

PENNSYLVANIA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 2, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 2, 2025 (267 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability

#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.

Corrective Action Plan

View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2020 — management decision was due March 16, 2021.

2019-001
Cost Allowability

#2019-001 ? Significant Deficiency ? Allowable Costs Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, CFDA #16.738 Criteria The Department of Justice, Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, CFDA #16.738 Compliance Supplement requires the auditor to test various compliance requirements. Allowable costs require the auditor to vouch federal award expenditures to appropriate, detailed supporting documentation to determine cost allowability. Condition During our testwork of allowable costs, it was noted that one (1) individual expense report failed to include detailed meal expenses. As a result, we were unable to determine the allowability of items purchased at a restaurant and unable to determine the participants. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not possessing detailed receipts could include charging non-allowable costs to the federal awards such as alcohol or non-approved personnel such as spouses attending, and the expenditures being allocated to the grant. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The findings noted related to one (1) individual and was not noted with other individuals submitting expense reports. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Section III ? Findings and Questioned Costs ? Major Federal Award Programs Audit (continued): #2019-001 ? Significant Deficiency ? Allowability (continued) Recommendation We recommend that the Organization only accept detailed receipts from all employees and subcontractors. If detailed receipts are not provided, we recommend the Organization not charge the expenditure to the federal award. We further recommend that management confirm the accuracy of the computations for expense reports. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action The Association agrees with the report and accepts your finding. One of our contractors did not submit an itemized receipt for meal(s) at a restaurant. This is not the practice of the Association. The Association will continue to mandate detailed receipts for all our contractors. We will not accept expenses for meal purchases at restaurants unless they provide detailed receipts.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

#2019-001 ? Significant Deficiency ? Allowable Costs Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, CFDA #16.738 Criteria The Department of Justice, Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, CFDA #16.738 Compliance Supplement requires the auditor to test various compliance requirements. Allowable costs require the auditor to vouch federal award expenditures to appropriate, detailed supporting documentation to determine cost allowability. Condition During our testwork of allowable costs, it was noted that one (1) individual expense report failed to include detailed meal expenses. As a result, we were unable to determine the allowability of items purchased at a restaurant and unable to determine the participants. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not possessing detailed receipts could include charging non-allowable costs to the federal awards such as alcohol or non-approved personnel such as spouses attending, and the expenditures being allocated to the grant. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The findings noted related to one (1) individual and was not noted with other individuals submitting expense reports. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Section III ? Findings and Questioned Costs ? Major Federal Award Programs Audit (continued): #2019-001 ? Significant Deficiency ? Allowability (continued) Recommendation We recommend that the Organization only accept detailed receipts from all employees and subcontractors. If detailed receipts are not provided, we recommend the Organization not charge the expenditure to the federal award. We further recommend that management confirm the accuracy of the computations for expense reports. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action The Association agrees with the report and accepts your finding. One of our contractors did not submit an itemized receipt for meal(s) at a restaurant. This is not the practice of the Association. The Association will continue to mandate detailed receipts for all our contractors. We will not accept expenses for meal purchases at restaurants unless they provide detailed receipts.

Corrective Action Plan

The Association agrees with the finding. One of our contractors did not submit an itemized receipt for meal(s) at a restaurant. This is not the practice of the Association. The Association will continue to mandate detailed receipts for all our contractors. We will not accept expenses for meal purchases at restaurants unless they provide detailed receipts.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2018 — management decision was due March 16, 2019.

2017-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.