NATURAL RESOURCE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE

EIN: 204451390

UEI: PLSSXKLHE615

Data as of August 24, 2026

NATURAL RESOURCE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE2 audit years1 findings
2
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 15, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 15, 2025 (556 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Cost Allowability

NRGI has a timekeeping system in place that provides for employees to record hours worked to specific cost objectives, including to U.S. Government grants. However, we noted that in several cases, the allocation amounts as per the timekeeping system were different from the amounts ultimately recorded within NRGI's general ledger. While the differences were not significant, these discrepancies indicate a deficiency in the internal controls around recording of salary expenditures to projects. Cause: The primary cause appears to be human error, and the result of manual recordkeeping. Effect or Potential Effect: Salary expenditures that are not charged in accordance with the standards referenced above may be questioned or disallowed by the donor. Questioned Costs: Undetermined. Context: This is a condition identified per review of NRGI's compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that management revisit its procedures for transferring data from the timekeeping system to the general ledger and implement proper internal controls to ensure that the amounts of salary expenditures charged to grants in the general ledger reconcile to the amounts calculated by the timekeeping system.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-002 Salaries and Wages (Allowable Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Section 200.430(i), charges to Federal grants for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and the records must: i. Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ii. Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; iii. Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; iv. Encompass Federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity’s written policy; v. Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; vi. [Reserved] vii. Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. viii. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards.” Condition: NRGI has a timekeeping system in place that provides for employees to record hours worked to specific cost objectives, including to U.S. Government grants. However, we noted that in several cases, the allocation amounts as per the timekeeping system were different from the amounts ultimately recorded within NRGI's general ledger. While the differences were not significant, these discrepancies indicate a deficiency in the internal controls around recording of salary expenditures to projects. Cause: The primary cause appears to be human error, and the result of manual recordkeeping. Effect or Potential Effect: Salary expenditures that are not charged in accordance with the standards referenced above may be questioned or disallowed by the donor. Questioned Costs: Undetermined. Context: This is a condition identified per review of NRGI's compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that management revisit its procedures for transferring data from the timekeeping system to the general ledger and implement proper internal controls to ensure that the amounts of salary expenditures charged to grants in the general ledger reconcile to the amounts calculated by the timekeeping system.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials: Due to the nature of our operations, we have a multinational payroll carried out in our subsidiaries. The timekeeping records are produced by the employees and reviewed by managers, are received by the finance team once the month is closed and the salaries being paid. To distribute the payroll data to grants as per the allocations in the timekeeping data there is an unavoidable manual aspect which is open to human error. Additional internal controls will be put in place to eliminate human error as far as possible in future.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.