CATO-MERIDIAN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

EIN: 156002156

UEI: DU65PT5CNFD9

Data as of August 20, 2026

7
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 13, 2026, which was (39 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
Condition

Assistance Listing Number 10.555 National School Lunch Program/National School Lunch Program-Non-Cash Assistance (Commodities)/Supply Chain Assistance-COVID-19 10.553 National School Breakfast Program 10.559 National Summer Food Service Program Year Ended – June 30, 2025 Federal Agency – U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria – The Uniform Grant Guidance requires that New York State school districts follow formal procurement methods. Condition – One vendor paid with grant funds was paid in excess of established thresholds and was not competitively bid in accordance with the District’s procurement policy. Cause – The District compared approved state contract pricing and requested quotes from vendors that it had existing relationships with. The vendor’s quote was less than the approved state contract pricing, so the District moved forward with the purchase. Effect – The District will not be considered a low-risk auditee for single audit purposes. In addition, the District is not in compliance with its procurement policy. Questioned Costs – There were no questioned costs noted related to this finding. Context – This finding was identified during testing of purchases made with grant funds, follow up inquiries of management, and review of the related policies noted above. Recommendation – We recommend the District ensure that proper bidding procedures are followed when purchases or projects exceed the applicable threshold of $20,000/$35,000. District’s Response – In the case reviewed, the District obtained State contract pricing but also requested quotes from vendors with whom we had established relationships with. In this case, the established vendor provided a lower cost option to the District and this resulted in a saving of public dollars. Moving forward, the District will utilize State contract pricing or will publicly bid all costs above the policy threshold. It should be noted that this may result in a higher cost to the district for goods and services.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan In the case reviewed, the District obtained State contract pricing but also requested quotes from vendors with whom we had established relationships with. In this case, the established vendor provided a lower cost option to the District and this resulted in a saving of public dollars. Moving forward, the District will utilize State contract pricing or will publicly bid all costs above the policy threshold. It should be noted that this may result in a higher cost to the district for goods and services. Responsible Party Elizabeth Kupiec, Assistant Superintendent Anticipated Completion Date June 30, 2026

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.