Hoosick Falls Central School District

EIN: 146004169

UEI: HKNKU7B1N2J4

Data as of August 22, 2026

Hoosick Falls Central School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 12, 2026 (20 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment

Finding 2025-001: Federal Award Finding – Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Child Nutrition Cluster (ALN 10.553 / 10.555) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: New York State Education Department Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Criteria Title 2 CFR §200.318(a) requires non-federal entities to use documented procurement procedures consistent with state, local, and federal law. The School District’s procurement policy requires competitive bidding for purchases exceeding $20,000. Condition During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the School District made purchases charged to the Child Nutrition Program in excess of $20,000 without obtaining competitive bids as required by the School District’s procurement policy. Cause District personnel did not consistently apply the School District’s written procurement policy when making purchases funded by the Child Nutrition Program. Effect The School District did not comply with federal procurement requirements under 2 CFR §200.318(a). Failure to follow required procurement procedures increases the risk that goods and services are not obtained at the most competitive price and limits assurance that federal funds are expended in accordance with applicable requirements. Questioned Costs None. Based on audit procedures performed, the costs tested appeared reasonable and allowable. Auditor’s Recommendation We recommend the School District strengthen controls over procurement to ensure purchases charged to federal programs comply with the School District’s written procurement policy and federal procurement requirements. This includes training staff responsible for procurement and implementing monitoring procedures to ensure competitive bidding requirements are consistently followed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-001: Federal Award Finding – Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Child Nutrition Cluster (ALN 10.553 / 10.555) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: New York State Education Department Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Criteria Title 2 CFR §200.318(a) requires non-federal entities to use documented procurement procedures consistent with state, local, and federal law. The School District’s procurement policy requires competitive bidding for purchases exceeding $20,000. Condition During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the School District made purchases charged to the Child Nutrition Program in excess of $20,000 without obtaining competitive bids as required by the School District’s procurement policy. Cause District personnel did not consistently apply the School District’s written procurement policy when making purchases funded by the Child Nutrition Program. Effect The School District did not comply with federal procurement requirements under 2 CFR §200.318(a). Failure to follow required procurement procedures increases the risk that goods and services are not obtained at the most competitive price and limits assurance that federal funds are expended in accordance with applicable requirements. Questioned Costs None. Based on audit procedures performed, the costs tested appeared reasonable and allowable. Auditor’s Recommendation We recommend the School District strengthen controls over procurement to ensure purchases charged to federal programs comply with the School District’s written procurement policy and federal procurement requirements. This includes training staff responsible for procurement and implementing monitoring procedures to ensure competitive bidding requirements are consistently followed.

Corrective Action Plan

February 26, 2026 Federal Awards Finding 2025-001: Child Nutrition Cluster (CFDA 10.553, 10.555) Compliance Requirement - Procurement Condition – The School District made purchases charged to the Child Nutrition Program in excess of $20,000 without obtaining competitive bids as required by the School District’s procurement policy. Corrective Action Plan – The school lunch manager will monitor expenses for the Child Nutrition Program to ensure no purchases will be made in excess of $20,000 that have not been competitively bid for the 2025-2026 school year. For the 2026-2027 school year, the school lunch manager will competitively bid the products for all vendors that may exceed $20,000 for the school year. Responsible School District Official – Emily M. Sanders, School Business Administrator Completion Date – July 1, 2026

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2019-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2019 — management decision was due May 1, 2020.

2019-001
Eligibility

Children from households with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive meals or milk free under the School Nutrition Programs. Children from households with incomes above 130 percent but at or below 185 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive reduced price meals. Persons from households with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the poverty level pay the full price (7 CFR sections 245.2, 245.3, and 245.6; section 9(b)(1) of the NSLA (42 USC 1758 (b)(1)); sections 3(a)(6) and 4(e) of the CNA (42 USC 1772(a)(6) and 1773(e))). We sampled 25 students receiving benefits under the Child Nutrition Cluster programs. We noted that one student was receiving free lunch benefits, but should have received reduced lunch benefits. In this instance, income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility, causing an incorrect certification. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was not statistically valid. In addition, we noted that there was a lack of evidence for review of applications. Applications must be reviewed, and the household number and income should be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to determine whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. Adequate oversight of the eligibility determination process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in determining eligibility. We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are made correctly. We also recommend that the School District ensures that applications are reviewed, as well as the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. As an additional level of control, the Treasurer will compare an annual eligibility report to the student applications, as well as ensure applications are being reviewed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Children from households with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive meals or milk free under the School Nutrition Programs. Children from households with incomes above 130 percent but at or below 185 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible to receive reduced price meals. Persons from households with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the poverty level pay the full price (7 CFR sections 245.2, 245.3, and 245.6; section 9(b)(1) of the NSLA (42 USC 1758 (b)(1)); sections 3(a)(6) and 4(e) of the CNA (42 USC 1772(a)(6) and 1773(e))). We sampled 25 students receiving benefits under the Child Nutrition Cluster programs. We noted that one student was receiving free lunch benefits, but should have received reduced lunch benefits. In this instance, income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility, causing an incorrect certification. Known and likely questioned costs were determined not to be material or exceed $25,000. The sampling methodology used was not statistically valid. In addition, we noted that there was a lack of evidence for review of applications. Applications must be reviewed, and the household number and income should be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to determine whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. Adequate oversight of the eligibility determination process was not in place in order to identify mistakes in determining eligibility. We recommend that the School District institute additional procedures to ensure that eligibility determinations are made correctly. We also recommend that the School District ensures that applications are reviewed, as well as the household number and income be compared to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines to calculate whether the student qualifies for free or reduced lunch. As an additional level of control, the Treasurer will compare an annual eligibility report to the student applications, as well as ensure applications are being reviewed.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition ? One student was receiving free lunch benefits, but should have received reduced lunch benefits. Household income was incorrectly calculated when determining eligibility causing an incorrect certification. In addition, there was a lack of evidence for review of the applications. Corrective Action Plan ? The school lunch manager and secretary will document evidence of their review of the application and keep a copy of the eligibility determination sent to the household. During the review, they will compare the household number and income to the National Income Eligibility Guidelines. Annually, the District Treasurer will compare the eligibility report to the student applications for accuracy and ensure that the documentation of application review is completed.

About Eligibility →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.