EIN: 141340095
UEI: U5WBFKEBLMX3
Data as of August 26, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 6, 2025 (416 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Through testing a sample of 25 students who were awarded and disbursed federal financial aid in accordance with Eligibility and Disbursement compliance requirements as prescribed by the OMB Compliance Supplement, one student selected was awarded and disbursed aid from the Federal Pell Grant Program in excess of what was calculated based on the student’s half-time enrollment status per the Disbursement Schedule for the spring 2024 semester. Cause: The cause of this finding was due to human error when updating the student’s financial aid profile in the student information system, Banner. The student was initially enrolled as a full-time student, the student’s Federal Pell Grant was calculated using full time enrollment and entered into the financial aid package for the semester in Banner. The student dropped to half-time enrollment in the middle of the semester at which point the student’s aid under the Federal Pell Grant was also reduced to reflect the appropriate amount at half-time enrollment. However, towards the end of the semester, the student withdrew entirely prompting a return of Title IV calculation to determine if the student’s financial aid package required adjustment. Upon finalizing review of the Title IV calculation and the student’s updated leave status in the Banner system, the award amount for the Federal Pell Grant was never adjusted to reflect the student’s half-time status. As the awarded amount was never updated, once the student’s financial aid package was locked in the Banner system after the student’s withdrawal, the system automatically disbursed the additional amount of Federal Pell Grant funds to the student’s bursar account. Effect: The student was incorrectly awarded and disbursed aid under the Federal Pell Grant Program in excess of the amount eligible resulting in an overpayment of approximately $1,335. Questioned Costs: $1,335 overpayment of Federal Pell Grant Program Recommendation: We recommend the Institute provide additional training to individuals involved in the process to ensure changes made to financial aid packages are appropriate and in accordance with requirements. Additionally, we recommend the Institute enhance its existing controls regarding the reconciliation of student financial records to the Department of Education’s Common Origination and Disbursement system. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan: Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included on the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2024-001 – Non-compliance with Eligibility and Disbursement Requirements for the Federal Pell Grant Program Grantor: Department of Education Program Name: Federal Pell Grant Program Award Year: 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 Award Number: P063P230300 Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 Criteria: Per 34 CFR 690.62(a), “the amount of a student’s Pell Grant for an academic year is based upon the payment and disbursement schedules published by the Secretary for each award year”. Per 34 CFR 690.63(b), “the Federal Pell Grant for a payment period, i.e. an academic term, for a student in a program using standard terms with at least 30 weeks of instructional time in two semesters or trimesters or in three quarters as described in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(A) of this section, is calculated by – (1) Determining his or her enrollment status for the term; (2) Based upon that enrollment status, determining his or her annual award from the Payment Schedule for full-time students or the Disbursement Schedule for three-quarter-time, half-time, or less-than-half-time students; and (3) Dividing the amount described under paragraph (b)(2) of this section by – (i) Two at institutions using semesters or trimesters or three at institutions using quarters; or (ii) The number of terms over which the institution chooses to distribute the student’s annual award if – (A) An institution chooses to distribute all of the student’s annual award determined under paragraph (b)(2) of this section over more than two terms at institutions using semesters or trimesters or more than three quarters at institutions using quarters; and (B) The number of weeks of instructional time in the terms, including the additional term or terms, equals the weeks of instructional time in the program’s academic year.” Condition: Through testing a sample of 25 students who were awarded and disbursed federal financial aid in accordance with Eligibility and Disbursement compliance requirements as prescribed by the OMB Compliance Supplement, one student selected was awarded and disbursed aid from the Federal Pell Grant Program in excess of what was calculated based on the student’s half-time enrollment status per the Disbursement Schedule for the spring 2024 semester. Cause: The cause of this finding was due to human error when updating the student’s financial aid profile in the student information system, Banner. The student was initially enrolled as a full-time student, the student’s Federal Pell Grant was calculated using full time enrollment and entered into the financial aid package for the semester in Banner. The student dropped to half-time enrollment in the middle of the semester at which point the student’s aid under the Federal Pell Grant was also reduced to reflect the appropriate amount at half-time enrollment. However, towards the end of the semester, the student withdrew entirely prompting a return of Title IV calculation to determine if the student’s financial aid package required adjustment. Upon finalizing review of the Title IV calculation and the student’s updated leave status in the Banner system, the award amount for the Federal Pell Grant was never adjusted to reflect the student’s half-time status. As the awarded amount was never updated, once the student’s financial aid package was locked in the Banner system after the student’s withdrawal, the system automatically disbursed the additional amount of Federal Pell Grant funds to the student’s bursar account. Effect: The student was incorrectly awarded and disbursed aid under the Federal Pell Grant Program in excess of the amount eligible resulting in an overpayment of approximately $1,335. Questioned Costs: $1,335 overpayment of Federal Pell Grant Program Recommendation: We recommend the Institute provide additional training to individuals involved in the process to ensure changes made to financial aid packages are appropriate and in accordance with requirements. Additionally, we recommend the Institute enhance its existing controls regarding the reconciliation of student financial records to the Department of Education’s Common Origination and Disbursement system. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan: Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included on the report.
Management View and Corrective Action Plan Finding Number: 2024-001 Grantor: Department of Education Program Name: Federal Pell Grant Program Award Year: 7/1/2023 - 6/30/2024 Award Number: P063P230300 Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.063 Management concurs that it made an overpayment in the amount of $1,335 in the Federal Pell Grant Program. The following controls will be added to ensure that overpayment does not occur in the future. 1. Training will be provided to individuals involved in the process to ensure that changes made to financial aid packages are appropriate and in accordance with requirements. 2. The R2T4 checklist used for all students with federal aid who withdraw mid-semester will be updated with a reminder to check the Pell Offered/Accepted/Paid amount prior to locking the funds to ensure the amounts are the same. 3. The Office of Financial Aid (OFA) will explore the possibility of developing a report that will check all Pell recipients, within a given year, for discrepancies between Offered/Accepted/Paid Pell amounts in Banner on a monthly basis. If a discrepancy exists, OFA staff will review and adjust as necessary in a far more timely manner. Management expects to implement these controls during the Spring 2025 term. Kelli Perry Associate Vice President for Finance and Controller
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2024 — management decision was due July 5, 2024.
Through testing of the FEMA program in the 2023 Uniform Guidance audit, we noted $619,653 of funds from this program, that were obligated in fiscal 2022 and included in the 2023 SEFA that should have been included in the 2022 SEFA. On the 2022 SEFA, management did not record any reimbursement for awards approved by FEMA. Cause: The cause of this finding was due to incorrect understanding of the reporting requirements related to this program which are unlike other federal programs. Effect: FEMA funding of $619,653 was incorrectly excluded from the 2022 SEFA and included in the 2023 SEFA. This did not impact the prior year or current year major program determinations. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should enhance controls in place to review reporting requirements related to the federal programs to ensure expenditures are recorded in the appropriate period’s SEFA. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan: Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included on the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grantor: Department of Homeland Security Pass-through Entity: New York State Office of Emergency Management Program Name: COVID-19 Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Award Year: 07/2022 - 06/2023 Award Number: PA-02-NY-4480-PW-00788 Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Criteria: Per the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (“FEMA”) Public Assistance Program, nonfederal entities must record expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (“SEFA”) when (1) FEMA has approved the nonfederal entity’s project worksheet, and (2) the nonfederal entity has incurred the eligible expenditures. Condition: Through testing of the FEMA program in the 2023 Uniform Guidance audit, we noted $619,653 of funds from this program, that were obligated in fiscal 2022 and included in the 2023 SEFA that should have been included in the 2022 SEFA. On the 2022 SEFA, management did not record any reimbursement for awards approved by FEMA. Cause: The cause of this finding was due to incorrect understanding of the reporting requirements related to this program which are unlike other federal programs. Effect: FEMA funding of $619,653 was incorrectly excluded from the 2022 SEFA and included in the 2023 SEFA. This did not impact the prior year or current year major program determinations. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should enhance controls in place to review reporting requirements related to the federal programs to ensure expenditures are recorded in the appropriate period’s SEFA. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan: Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included on the report.
Grantor: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Program Name: COVID-19 Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Award Year: 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 Award Number: PA-02-NY-4480-PW-00788 Assistance Listing Numbers: 97.036 Management concurs that it omitted $620K of FEMA reimbursement from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in fiscal 2022. The reimbursement was obligated in in fiscal 2022 but paid in fiscal 2023. The 2023 compliance supplement clarified the appropriate reporting of these funds. Management has implemented a review process to determine the appropriate reporting period going forward. Kelli Perry Associate Vice President for Finance and Controller
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.
We reviewed a sample of twenty-five students enrolled at Rensselaer who received either Pell and/or Direct Loans and had a change of enrollment status during the fiscal year. Of the twenty-five students tested, two students were reported to NSLDS with an inaccurate enrollment status. Both students were on a leave of absence effective during the spring semester, however, the change in enrollment status was not reported to NSLDS and both students were reported as full time during the spring semester. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Rensselaer utilizes the National Student Clearinghouse (?NSC?) to submit enrollment information to NSLDS. Rensselaer reported the status change for these two students to NSC, however, due to enrollment data errors, these changes were not submitted successfully. Due to staffing constraints in the Registrar?s Office, when the enrollment data errors were corrected and resubmitted to NSC, the students? status was reported inaccurately as full time. Effect: A student?s enrollment status determines eligibility for in-school status, deferment, and grace periods, as well as for the payment of interest subsidies all of which are impacted by inaccurate and late reporting. Recommendation: We recommend Rensselaer validate enrollment reporting parameters to ensure enrollment information pulled from Rensselaer?s student information system is submitted to NSC accurately and timely. We also recommend Rensselaer update its processes to effectively and timely record student status changes within its student information system and ensure all individuals involved in administering student status changes abide by Rensselaer?s policies and procedures. Management?s Response: Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of prior audit findings and status.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Award Names: Federal Pell Grant Program and Federal Direct Loan Program Award Year: 7/1/2021 - 6/30/2022 Award Number: Not applicable Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.063 and 84.268 Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2) and 685.309, institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Federal Pell Grant (?Pell?) and Federal Direct Loan (?Direct Loan?) programs through the National Student Loan Data System (?NSLDS?). The enrollment information, including Campus Level and Program Level data, must be reviewed, updated, and validated by the institution promptly. Furthermore, specific to the Direct Loan program, for a student that received a Direct Loan and was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student had ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended, the institution must report the change within 60 days from which the change was identified. Condition: We reviewed a sample of twenty-five students enrolled at Rensselaer who received either Pell and/or Direct Loans and had a change of enrollment status during the fiscal year. Of the twenty-five students tested, two students were reported to NSLDS with an inaccurate enrollment status. Both students were on a leave of absence effective during the spring semester, however, the change in enrollment status was not reported to NSLDS and both students were reported as full time during the spring semester. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Rensselaer utilizes the National Student Clearinghouse (?NSC?) to submit enrollment information to NSLDS. Rensselaer reported the status change for these two students to NSC, however, due to enrollment data errors, these changes were not submitted successfully. Due to staffing constraints in the Registrar?s Office, when the enrollment data errors were corrected and resubmitted to NSC, the students? status was reported inaccurately as full time. Effect: A student?s enrollment status determines eligibility for in-school status, deferment, and grace periods, as well as for the payment of interest subsidies all of which are impacted by inaccurate and late reporting. Recommendation: We recommend Rensselaer validate enrollment reporting parameters to ensure enrollment information pulled from Rensselaer?s student information system is submitted to NSC accurately and timely. We also recommend Rensselaer update its processes to effectively and timely record student status changes within its student information system and ensure all individuals involved in administering student status changes abide by Rensselaer?s policies and procedures. Management?s Response: Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of prior audit findings and status.
Finding 2022-001 - Non-Compliance with Timely and Accurate Student Enrollment Change Submissions to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Award Names: Federal Pell Grant Program and Federal Direct Loan Program Award Year: 7/1/2021 - 6/30/2022 Award Number: Not applicable Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.063 and 84.268 Rensselaer agrees with the finding and in concurrence with the recommendations has developed and is implementing the following corrective action plans: Rensselaer?s Registrar?s Office is working with Rensselaer?s IT Department (?EIS?) to validate the logic of the data parameters included within every enrollment file. Validation will include ensuring all student status changes are reported in the enrollment file, including retroactive changes even if the student is not enrolled in the current semester. Rajni Soharu, the Institute?s Registrar, is responsible for implementing this corrective action plan by March 31, 2023. As of the date of this report, the Registrar?s Office is now fully staffed and employees are trained on the student status change requirements and system usage. Additionally, Rensselaer?s Student Success Office will now communicate changes in student enrollment information to the Registrar?s Office in real-time through a shared file. The shared file will be updated by the Student Success Office as soon as they receive any new approved leave of absence or withdrawal information from Student Health Services or other departments. The Registrar?s Office will update the student?s enrollment information within the student information system within three business days of the change reported and ensure the student?s status change is timely and accurately submitted to the National Student Clearinghouse. Rajni Soharu, the Institute?s Registrar, in collaboration with members of the Student Success Office are responsible for implementing this corrective action plan by January 31, 2023. Eileen McLoughlin Vice President for Finance and CFO
FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2022 — management decision was due July 6, 2022.
Finding 2021-001 ? Cash Management Grantor: National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation Program: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing #: 93.394 and 47.049 Title: Discovery and Applied Research for Technological Innovations to Improve Human Health and Mathematical and Physical Sciences Award Year: 07/01/2020 ? 06/30/2021 Award Number: 5R01CA237267-02 and DMS-1344962 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 (b)(3), reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per 2 CFR 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. Per the OMB Compliance Supplement, the non-Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition In testing compliance with the cash management compliance requirement in accordance with the OMB Compliance Supplement, specifically the reimbursement method, 25 individual expenditures were tested to compare the date Rensselaer paid the vendor to the date Rensselaer requested sponsor reimbursement. We noted 2 instances in which reimbursement was requested from the sponsor before Rensselaer paid the vendor, as shown in the chart below. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart. Cause Management?s current process when requesting reimbursement to sponsors is to ensure that the expenditures are incurred. Effect Rensselaer requested and received Federal reimbursement prior to paying vendors for the selected expenses. Questioned Costs None as reimbursement was requested for allowable costs. Recommendation Rensselaer should revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure expenditures are paid in compliance with Federal reimbursement requirements. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2021-001 ? Cash Management Grantor: National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation Program: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing #: 93.394 and 47.049 Title: Discovery and Applied Research for Technological Innovations to Improve Human Health and Mathematical and Physical Sciences Award Year: 07/01/2020 ? 06/30/2021 Award Number: 5R01CA237267-02 and DMS-1344962 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 (b)(3), reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per 2 CFR 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. Per the OMB Compliance Supplement, the non-Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition In testing compliance with the cash management compliance requirement in accordance with the OMB Compliance Supplement, specifically the reimbursement method, 25 individual expenditures were tested to compare the date Rensselaer paid the vendor to the date Rensselaer requested sponsor reimbursement. We noted 2 instances in which reimbursement was requested from the sponsor before Rensselaer paid the vendor, as shown in the chart below. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart. Cause Management?s current process when requesting reimbursement to sponsors is to ensure that the expenditures are incurred. Effect Rensselaer requested and received Federal reimbursement prior to paying vendors for the selected expenses. Questioned Costs None as reimbursement was requested for allowable costs. Recommendation Rensselaer should revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure expenditures are paid in compliance with Federal reimbursement requirements. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Management View and Corrective Action Plan Finding 2021-001 ? Cash Management Grantor: National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation Program: Research and Development Cluster CFDA #: 93.394 and 47.049 Title: Discovery and Applied Research for Technological Innovations to Improve Human Health and Mathematical and Physical Sciences Award Year: 07/01/2020 ? 06/30/2021 Award Number: 5R01CA237267-02 and DMS-1344962 The Institute is currently following and believes it is in compliance with cash management regulations as written in 2 CFR Part 200.305(b) which require the organization to minimize the time elapsing between request for reimbursement from sponsoring agencies and payment to the supplier. We understand that inconsistencies exist in the interpretation of the cash management compliance requirement. On October 20, 2017, the Council On Government Relations (COGR) wrote a letter to the Office of Financial Management expressing concern that the cash management requirement language in the Compliance Supplement was not aligned with the requirements for cash management as currently written in 2 CFR Part 200.305(b). This continues to be a concern to date. When recipients request reimbursement from sponsoring agencies on a cost reimbursable basis, they are invoicing for expenditures. Required certifications as written in 2 CFR 200.415 state that recipients are certifying expenditures they invoice for, which aligns with drawing down funds based on expenditures, as opposed to what has already been paid, as the Compliance Supplement states. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.34 explicitly defines expenditures as including charges made on an accrual basis due to changes in amounts owed for goods, property, services, and programs. The Institute agrees with COGR?s position and believes that adhering to the language in the Compliance Supplement would potentially lead to an unreasonable administrative burden for the Institute and possibly a reconfiguration of an electronic process to a manual one in an effort to ensure each supplier has been paid prior to requesting reimbursement from the sponsoring agency. That said, the Institute will re-evaluate the electronic process in place to determine if a change can be made to meet the Compliance Supplement requirements. The Institute will also continue to monitor the OMB interpretation and watch for a potential change to the requirement in the Compliance Supplement, as well as work with our cognizant agency to understand their interpretation of the requirements. Eileen McLoughlin Vice President for Finance and CFO
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.