EIN: 061548706
UEI: MQ3WUBSMD736
Data as of August 21, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 4, 2026 (104 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During testing of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, we noted that certain Federal program expenditures related to activities incurred in fiscal year 2023 were reported in the 2024 SEFA instead of in the 2023 SEFA. Cause: Management’s procedures for preparing and reviewing the SEFA did not include sufficient controls to ensure that expenditures are reported in the correct fiscal year. Effect: The SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2023 was incomplete, and the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes expenditures that related to activities incurred in fiscal year 2023. Although the expenditures were allowable costs of the Federal program, the timing misstatement affects the accuracy of SEFA presentation and could affect the usefulness of SEFA information to Federal agencies and pass-through entities in their monitoring and oversight. The error did not impact the major program selection process for 2023 or 2024.Perspective: This issue was identified during our testing of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, when we noted that ATS reported $114,984 of Federal award expenditures in 2024 that related to activities incurred in fiscal year 2023. These expenditures should have been reported in the SEFA for year ended December 31, 2023. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should implement formal procedures for compiling the SEFA, including (1) reconciling SEFA amounts to the general ledger and other supporting records, (2) performing a year-end review to confirm that expenditures are reported in the correct fiscal year in accordance with 2 CFR §200.502 and 2 CFR §200.510(b), and (3) documenting supervisory review of the SEFA prior to finalization.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR §200.510(b) requires recipients of Federal funds to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements that includes Federal awards expended during that fiscal year. 2 CFR §500.502 provides that the determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Condition: During testing of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, we noted that certain Federal program expenditures related to activities incurred in fiscal year 2023 were reported in the 2024 SEFA instead of in the 2023 SEFA. Cause: Management’s procedures for preparing and reviewing the SEFA did not include sufficient controls to ensure that expenditures are reported in the correct fiscal year. Effect: The SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2023 was incomplete, and the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes expenditures that related to activities incurred in fiscal year 2023. Although the expenditures were allowable costs of the Federal program, the timing misstatement affects the accuracy of SEFA presentation and could affect the usefulness of SEFA information to Federal agencies and pass-through entities in their monitoring and oversight. The error did not impact the major program selection process for 2023 or 2024.Perspective: This issue was identified during our testing of the SEFA for the year ended December 31, 2024, when we noted that ATS reported $114,984 of Federal award expenditures in 2024 that related to activities incurred in fiscal year 2023. These expenditures should have been reported in the SEFA for year ended December 31, 2023. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should implement formal procedures for compiling the SEFA, including (1) reconciling SEFA amounts to the general ledger and other supporting records, (2) performing a year-end review to confirm that expenditures are reported in the correct fiscal year in accordance with 2 CFR §200.502 and 2 CFR §200.510(b), and (3) documenting supervisory review of the SEFA prior to finalization.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Finance Department will ensure an accurate SEFA in conjunction with the response for Finding 2024-002.
ATS’s organization-wide procurement policy does not include documented procurement procedures that address the Uniform Guidance requirements for procurement under Federal awards (for example, methods of procurement, competition requirements, and applicable thresholds) as required by 2 CFR §200.318-200.320. For the federally funded program, ATS implemented a separate written selection policy for contractors/health systems; however, this policy does not fully address all Uniform Guidance procurement elements. Cause: Management had not fully updated its written procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the specific requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for procurements under Federal awards. As a result, internal control procedures over procurement under the Federal program were not fully documented in a manner consistent with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Failure to have and use fully documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with Federal procurement requirements and increase the risk of unallowable or improperly procured costs under Federal awards. In the current year, our testing did not identify specific instances in which procurement transactions under the Federal program were noncompliant; however, the lack of fully compliant written procedures represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Perspective: ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures that were fully compliant with 2 CFR §200.320 for procurement under Federal awards. However, for the Federal program, ATS established a documented selection criteria policy for contractors/health systems. Under this policy, a selection subcommittee reviews, evaluates, and selects health systems based on defined criteria, and each selected application is submitted to the prime awardee for review and approval before ATS issues contracts. In a random sample of 8 procurement contracts tested, all 8 followed the documented selection process and were supported by appropriate documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Continued Finding 2023-005. Recommendation: ATS should update and formalize its procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for all procurements under Federal awards, including: methods of procurement and thresholds, competition requirements, documentation of procurement history, and oversight responsibilities. Once updated, ATS should ensure the procurement under the Federal program is carried out in accordance with these policies and that staff are trained on the revised requirements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR §200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the award is managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the COSO Internal Control Integrated Framework. 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award that are consistent with the standards for general procurement, competition, and methods of procurement. Condition: ATS’s organization-wide procurement policy does not include documented procurement procedures that address the Uniform Guidance requirements for procurement under Federal awards (for example, methods of procurement, competition requirements, and applicable thresholds) as required by 2 CFR §200.318-200.320. For the federally funded program, ATS implemented a separate written selection policy for contractors/health systems; however, this policy does not fully address all Uniform Guidance procurement elements. Cause: Management had not fully updated its written procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the specific requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for procurements under Federal awards. As a result, internal control procedures over procurement under the Federal program were not fully documented in a manner consistent with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Failure to have and use fully documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with Federal procurement requirements and increase the risk of unallowable or improperly procured costs under Federal awards. In the current year, our testing did not identify specific instances in which procurement transactions under the Federal program were noncompliant; however, the lack of fully compliant written procedures represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Perspective: ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures that were fully compliant with 2 CFR §200.320 for procurement under Federal awards. However, for the Federal program, ATS established a documented selection criteria policy for contractors/health systems. Under this policy, a selection subcommittee reviews, evaluates, and selects health systems based on defined criteria, and each selected application is submitted to the prime awardee for review and approval before ATS issues contracts. In a random sample of 8 procurement contracts tested, all 8 followed the documented selection process and were supported by appropriate documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Continued Finding 2023-005. Recommendation: ATS should update and formalize its procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for all procurements under Federal awards, including: methods of procurement and thresholds, competition requirements, documentation of procurement history, and oversight responsibilities. Once updated, ATS should ensure the procurement under the Federal program is carried out in accordance with these policies and that staff are trained on the revised requirements.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ATS has drafted an organization-wide procurement policy to ensure it includes all the Uniform guidance procurement elements. The draft will be reviewed by senior management for comment prior to formal issuance.
2023-005
For the year ended December 31, 2023, ATS’s single audit reporting package was required to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by September 30, 2024 (nine months after year end). The auditors’ reports were issued on May 30, 2025, and the data collection form and reporting package were submitted on June 27, 2025. As a result, the submission did not meet the Uniform Guidance due date requirement. Cause: Fieldwork timelines for the 2023 audit were extended due to deficiencies in month end and year end closing, revenue recognition, and expense recognition and cut-off internal control processes, as outlined in findings 2023-001, 2023-002 and 2023-003. These delays in completing the financial statement audit and single audit contributed to the late issuance of the auditors’ reports and the late submission of the single audit reporting package. Effect: Late submission of the single audit reporting package represents noncompliance with the reporting requirements of 2 CFR §200.512(a). This noncompliance may result in ATS being considered a higher-risk auditee by Federal agencies and pass-through entities, and may negatively affect eligibility for future Federal funding. Perspective: Due to delays in completing the 2023 audit, ATS did not submit the single audit reporting package for the year ended December 31, 2023, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the required due date. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should implement and monitor procedures to ensure that future audits are completed in sufficient time to allow submission of the data collection form and single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the earlier of 30 days after the date of the auditors’ reports or nine months after the end of the fiscal year, in accordance with 2 CFR §200.512(a). This should include strengthening the underlying financial reporting and closing processes noted in related findings so that they do not delay audit completion.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR §200.512(a) requires the auditee to submit the data collection form and reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditors’ report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: For the year ended December 31, 2023, ATS’s single audit reporting package was required to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by September 30, 2024 (nine months after year end). The auditors’ reports were issued on May 30, 2025, and the data collection form and reporting package were submitted on June 27, 2025. As a result, the submission did not meet the Uniform Guidance due date requirement. Cause: Fieldwork timelines for the 2023 audit were extended due to deficiencies in month end and year end closing, revenue recognition, and expense recognition and cut-off internal control processes, as outlined in findings 2023-001, 2023-002 and 2023-003. These delays in completing the financial statement audit and single audit contributed to the late issuance of the auditors’ reports and the late submission of the single audit reporting package. Effect: Late submission of the single audit reporting package represents noncompliance with the reporting requirements of 2 CFR §200.512(a). This noncompliance may result in ATS being considered a higher-risk auditee by Federal agencies and pass-through entities, and may negatively affect eligibility for future Federal funding. Perspective: Due to delays in completing the 2023 audit, ATS did not submit the single audit reporting package for the year ended December 31, 2023, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the required due date. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should implement and monitor procedures to ensure that future audits are completed in sufficient time to allow submission of the data collection form and single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the earlier of 30 days after the date of the auditors’ reports or nine months after the end of the fiscal year, in accordance with 2 CFR §200.512(a). This should include strengthening the underlying financial reporting and closing processes noted in related findings so that they do not delay audit completion.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Finance Department acknowledges the late submission for the 2023 fiscal year. To ensure future compliance with Uniform Guidance deadlines, year-end close and audit preparation timelines have been restructured as per the response for Finding 2024-001.
FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2025 — management decision was due December 27, 2025.
During the testing of the procurement compliance requirement related to the major programs, it was determined that ATS did not have a documented procurement policy in place for procurement of property or services required under a Federal award. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement policies and procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria or Specific Requirements section above. Perspective: While ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with 2 CFR §200.320, ATS did establish a documented selection criteria policy for contractors under its Federal program. With this policy ATS created a selection subcommittee to review, evaluate and select contractors. The subcommittee evaluated the applications received and chose the contractors based on several selection criteria. Each contractor’s application was sent for review and approval by prime awardee. Within a random sample of 4 procurement contracts, 4 were selected based on the selection criteria policy established. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should update its procurement policy to include requirements for procurement of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by COSO. Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.320, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.318 and §200.319. Condition: During the testing of the procurement compliance requirement related to the major programs, it was determined that ATS did not have a documented procurement policy in place for procurement of property or services required under a Federal award. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement policies and procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria or Specific Requirements section above. Perspective: While ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with 2 CFR §200.320, ATS did establish a documented selection criteria policy for contractors under its Federal program. With this policy ATS created a selection subcommittee to review, evaluate and select contractors. The subcommittee evaluated the applications received and chose the contractors based on several selection criteria. Each contractor’s application was sent for review and approval by prime awardee. Within a random sample of 4 procurement contracts, 4 were selected based on the selection criteria policy established. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should update its procurement policy to include requirements for procurement of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Agree with recommendation. A draft procurement policy has been prepared. It will be modified to ensure compliance with procurement of property or services required under a Federal award. Employees with procurement responsibilities will be required to follow the policy.
During our audit, we noted that ATS did not perform checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential contractors or consultants were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that suspension and debarment checks were being performed prior to entering into contracts with contractors and consultants. Effect: The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the U.S. Government. Perspective: ATS established a new process where a debarment certification representation paragraph is automatically included on all the contractor agreements. ATS also issued contract modifications which included the debarment certification for all contracts signed prior to the change. Within a random sample of 24 disbursements, 17 disbursements to 3 contractors would have required compliance with the suspension and debarment check. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should continue including the debarment certification paragraph on all new contracts to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance going forward.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by COSO. Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted that ATS did not perform checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential contractors or consultants were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that suspension and debarment checks were being performed prior to entering into contracts with contractors and consultants. Effect: The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the U.S. Government. Perspective: ATS established a new process where a debarment certification representation paragraph is automatically included on all the contractor agreements. ATS also issued contract modifications which included the debarment certification for all contracts signed prior to the change. Within a random sample of 24 disbursements, 17 disbursements to 3 contractors would have required compliance with the suspension and debarment check. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should continue including the debarment certification paragraph on all new contracts to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Agree with recommendation. Prior to executing a contract, employees with responsibility for engaging contractors and consultants funded by a Federal award will be required to check SAM.gov. This step will be included in the procurement policy.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.