EIN: 046004802
UEI: UJE5VQQK2WM8
Data as of August 25, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 14, 2023 (1168 days ago).
What is a management decision? →SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2022-001 ? PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, & DEBARMENT Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program CRITERIA For procurements of $10,000 or more, there shall be maintained a written record which includes the contract and any amendments to the contract. If a contract is awarded pursuant to a formal solicitation, the written record shall also include the invitation for bids or request for proposals, the public notices and advertisements, the bids or proposals submitted and written evaluation of proposals. All written documentation required by this Section shall be maintained for a period of six years from the date of final payment under the contract. (Brookline Housing Authority Procurement Policy) CONDITION We examined a sample of 7 vendors used for goods and services during fiscal year 2022, as a result of our procedures, we identified 1 instance in which the Authority did not follow its policy regarding maintaining written documentation for purchases exceeding $10,000. The 1 instance related to frequently recurring transactions that resulted in aggregate purchases exceeding the competitive thresholds. The total payments to the seven vendors aggregated $1,207,503. CAUSE The Authority was in the process of implementing its corrective action plan from the prior year and was not able to review all procurements for vendors with frequently recurring transactions prior to March 31, 2022. EFFECT As a result of not adequately documenting the procurement decision, the Authority has not complied with their procurement policy and cannot ensure that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs were less than $25,000. CONTEXT We selected a sample of seven vendors used by the Authority during the year representing aggregate expenditures of $1,207,503. The Authority paid 75 vendors in excess of the micropurchase threshold of $10,000 for the fiscal year. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING This finding is repeated from finding 2021-001. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority continue with their corrective action plan from the prior year including: ? Periodically reviewing expenditures for frequently recurring transactions with vendors that could exceed the competitive procurement thresholds. ? Periodically compare the contract register against frequently used vendors. ? Solicit bids and competitively procure contracts for services and materials frequently used and maintain documentation supporting the procurement decision. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2022-001 ? PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, & DEBARMENT Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program CRITERIA For procurements of $10,000 or more, there shall be maintained a written record which includes the contract and any amendments to the contract. If a contract is awarded pursuant to a formal solicitation, the written record shall also include the invitation for bids or request for proposals, the public notices and advertisements, the bids or proposals submitted and written evaluation of proposals. All written documentation required by this Section shall be maintained for a period of six years from the date of final payment under the contract. (Brookline Housing Authority Procurement Policy) CONDITION We examined a sample of 7 vendors used for goods and services during fiscal year 2022, as a result of our procedures, we identified 1 instance in which the Authority did not follow its policy regarding maintaining written documentation for purchases exceeding $10,000. The 1 instance related to frequently recurring transactions that resulted in aggregate purchases exceeding the competitive thresholds. The total payments to the seven vendors aggregated $1,207,503. CAUSE The Authority was in the process of implementing its corrective action plan from the prior year and was not able to review all procurements for vendors with frequently recurring transactions prior to March 31, 2022. EFFECT As a result of not adequately documenting the procurement decision, the Authority has not complied with their procurement policy and cannot ensure that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs were less than $25,000. CONTEXT We selected a sample of seven vendors used by the Authority during the year representing aggregate expenditures of $1,207,503. The Authority paid 75 vendors in excess of the micropurchase threshold of $10,000 for the fiscal year. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING This finding is repeated from finding 2021-001. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority continue with their corrective action plan from the prior year including: ? Periodically reviewing expenditures for frequently recurring transactions with vendors that could exceed the competitive procurement thresholds. ? Periodically compare the contract register against frequently used vendors. ? Solicit bids and competitively procure contracts for services and materials frequently used and maintain documentation supporting the procurement decision. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
The Brookline Housing Authority (BHA) takes seriously all audit deficiencies. Immediate corrective action has and will be taken after Marcum LLP notified the BHA of this issue during the FY ?22 audit process. Specific details of how the BHA intends to address this finding are detailed below. 2022-001 ? Procurement, Suspension & Debarment For procurements of $10,000 or more, there shall be maintained a written record which includes the contract and any amendments to the contract. If a contract is awarded pursuant to a formal solicitation, the written record shall also include the invitation for bids or request for proposals, the public notices and advertisements, the bids or proposals submitted and written evaluation of proposals. All written documentation required by this Section shall be maintained for a period of six years from the date of final payment under the contract. (Brookline Housing Authority Procurement Policy) As a result of not adequately documenting the procurement decision, the Authority has not complied with their procurement policy and cannot ensure that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured. Auditee?s Response and Planned Corrective Action The BHA made strides during FY 2022 and strives to continue to prioritize contract and procurement practices that comply with applicable state (M.G.L 30B) and federal regulations. There was one issue, with one particular vendor that gave rise to this finding. The BHA Board of Commissioners approved an updated procurement policy as recommended by the Executive Director in the 1st quarter of FY 2022. This policy is compliant with both state and federal procurement guidelines but also contains additional controls on spending thresholds to ensure competitive contracting beyond regulatory requirements. The BHA already maintained records for six or more years from the date of final procurement for procurements $10,000 or larger. However, it did not have consistent record retention of small vendors that were used repeatedly under this $10,000 threshold and where bids could be solicited without an RFP. Going forward these records will be retained for repeatedly used vendors. The Director of Maintenance and Modernization has already been systematically re-procuring trades like electrical and painting in late FY 2022 and throughout FY 2023 where this was an issue and within a calendar year should fully re-procure all applicable services. The BHA is also planning to make the following immediate corrective actions and changes to internal controls: 1. The Director of Operations and Director of Maintenance and Modernization have both become certified Procurement Officers for the Brookline Housing Authority. 2. The Director of Operations, Director of Finance, and Executive Director will periodically review expenditures for frequently recurring transactions that could exceed competitive procurement thresholds. 3. The Director of Operations, Director of Finance, and Executive Director will periodically compare the contract register against frequently used vendors. 4. The BHA already retains a contract register and procurement details for competitive procurements over $10,000. The BHA will require all staff to retain solicitation records and materials used to make a procurement decision for smaller contracts and enter recurring contractors into the contract log. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: November 28, 2022. Persons Responsible for Corrective Action: Michael Alperin, Executive Director, Lisa Brown, Director of Operations, Chris Devoll, Director of Maintenance and Modernization and John Kelley, Director of Finance. (617)-277-2022
2021-001
FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2021 — management decision was due June 22, 2022.
2021-001 ? Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program CRITERIA For procurements of $10,000 or more, there shall be maintained a written record which includes the contract and any amendments to the contract. If a contract is awarded pursuant to a formal solicitation, the written record shall also include the invitation for bids or request for proposals, the public notices and advertisements, the bids or proposals submitted and written evaluation of proposals. All written documentation required by this Section shall be maintained for a period of six years from the date of final payment under the contract. (Brookline Housing Authority Procurement Policy) CONDITION We examined a sample of 7 vendors used for goods and services during fiscal year 2021, as a result of our procedures, we identified 3 instances in which the Authority did not follow its policy regarding maintaining written documentation for purchases exceeding $10,000. The 3 instances related to frequently recurring transactions that resulted in aggregate purchases exceeding the competitive thresholds. The total payments to the seven vendors aggregated $522,294. CAUSE During fiscal year 2021, there was turnover in Authority staff responsible for documenting the procurement process and the Authority was in the process of renovating its main office. EFFECT As a result of not adequately documenting the procurement decision, the Authority has not complied with their procurement policy and cannot ensure that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured. QUESTIONED COSTS We have identified known questioned costs for purchases which were not adequately documented and charged to the Public and Indian Housing Program of $76,510 representing the aggregate expenditures to the vendors identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of seven vendors used by the Authority during the year representing aggregate expenditures of $522,294. The Authority paid 75 vendors in excess of the micropurchase threshold of $10,000 for the fiscal year. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority make the following improvements to internal controls over procurement: ? Periodically review expenditures for frequently recurring transactions with vendors that could exceed the competitive procurement thresholds. ? Periodically compare the contract register against frequently used vendors. ? Solicit bids and competitively procure contracts for services and materials frequently used and maintain documentation supporting the procurement decision. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-001 ? Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program CRITERIA For procurements of $10,000 or more, there shall be maintained a written record which includes the contract and any amendments to the contract. If a contract is awarded pursuant to a formal solicitation, the written record shall also include the invitation for bids or request for proposals, the public notices and advertisements, the bids or proposals submitted and written evaluation of proposals. All written documentation required by this Section shall be maintained for a period of six years from the date of final payment under the contract. (Brookline Housing Authority Procurement Policy) CONDITION We examined a sample of 7 vendors used for goods and services during fiscal year 2021, as a result of our procedures, we identified 3 instances in which the Authority did not follow its policy regarding maintaining written documentation for purchases exceeding $10,000. The 3 instances related to frequently recurring transactions that resulted in aggregate purchases exceeding the competitive thresholds. The total payments to the seven vendors aggregated $522,294. CAUSE During fiscal year 2021, there was turnover in Authority staff responsible for documenting the procurement process and the Authority was in the process of renovating its main office. EFFECT As a result of not adequately documenting the procurement decision, the Authority has not complied with their procurement policy and cannot ensure that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured. QUESTIONED COSTS We have identified known questioned costs for purchases which were not adequately documented and charged to the Public and Indian Housing Program of $76,510 representing the aggregate expenditures to the vendors identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of seven vendors used by the Authority during the year representing aggregate expenditures of $522,294. The Authority paid 75 vendors in excess of the micropurchase threshold of $10,000 for the fiscal year. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority make the following improvements to internal controls over procurement: ? Periodically review expenditures for frequently recurring transactions with vendors that could exceed the competitive procurement thresholds. ? Periodically compare the contract register against frequently used vendors. ? Solicit bids and competitively procure contracts for services and materials frequently used and maintain documentation supporting the procurement decision. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
The Brookline Housing Authority (BHA) takes seriously all audit deficiencies. Immediate corrective action has and will be taken after Marcum LLP notified the BHA of these issues December 15, 2021. Specific details of how the BHA intends to address each finding are detailed below. 2021-001 ? Procurement, Suspension & Debarment For procurements of $10,000 or more, there shall be maintained a written record which includes the contract and any amendments to the contract. If a contract is awarded pursuant to a formal solicitation, the written record shall also include the invitation for bids or request for proposals, the public notices and advertisements, the bids or proposals submitted and written evaluation of proposals. All written documentation required by this Section shall be maintained for a period of six years from the date of final payment under the contract. (Brookline Housing Authority Procurement Policy) As a result of not adequately documenting the procurement decision, the Authority has not complied with their procurement policy and cannot ensure that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured. Auditee?s Response and Planned Corrective Action The BHA has and continues to prioritize contract and procurement practices that comply with applicable state (M.G.L 30B) and federal regulations. Prior to the issuance of the FY 2021 audit the BHA Board of Commissioners approved an updated procurement policy as recommended by the Executive Director on June 8, 2021. This policy is compliant with both state and federal procurement guidelines but also contains additional controls on spending thresholds to ensure competitive contracting beyond regulatory requirements. The BHA already maintained records for six or more years from the date of final procurement for procurements $10,000 or larger. However, it did not have consistent record retention of small vendors that were used repeatedly under this $10,000 threshold and where bids could be solicited without an RFP. Going forward these records will be retained for repeatedly used vendors. The BHA is also planning to make the following immediate corrective actions and changes to internal controls: 1. The Director of Operations will attend state and federal trainings to become a certified Procurement Officer for the Brookline Housing Authority. 2. The Director of Operations, Director of Finance, and Executive Director will periodically review expenditures for frequently recurring transactions that could exceed competitive procurement thresholds. 3. The Director of Operations, Director of Finance, and Executive Director will periodically compare the contract register against frequently used vendors. 4. The BHA already retains a contract register and procurement details for competitive procurements over $10,000. The BHA will require all staff to retain solicitation records and materials used to make a procurement decision for smaller contracts and enter recurring contractors into the contract log. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: June 8, 2021 (new procurement policy) and December 22, 2021. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Michael Alperin, Executive Director, Lisa Brown, Director of Operations, Chris Devoll, Director of Maintenance, and John Kelley, Director of Finance.
2021-002 ? Eligibility Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program CRITERIA The Authority is mandated to use HUD?s Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) system as a third party source to verify tenant employment and income information during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. (24 CFR 5.233) CONDITION We examined a sample of 25 participants in the Public Housing Program and identified 4 instances in which the EIV report was not used to verify tenant employment and income information. CAUSE The Authority?s internal control over eligibility compliance requirements was not effective at identifying the need use HUD?s EIV system during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. EFFECT As a result of not using HUD?s EIV system, the Authority has not adequately verified tenant?s income during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. QUESTIONED COSTS None Identified CONTEXT We selected a sample of 25 participants in the Public Housing Program. The Authority has 330 units of Public and Indian Housing. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample.2021-002 ? Eligibility REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority make the following improvements to internal controls over compliance: ? Establish written procedures related to using HUD?s Enterprise Income Verification System(EIV) ? Communicate to staff performing recertifications the requirement to use the EIV system ? Select a sample of recertifications and perform quality control reviews to ensure that EIV is being used. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-002 ? Eligibility Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Program CRITERIA The Authority is mandated to use HUD?s Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) system as a third party source to verify tenant employment and income information during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. (24 CFR 5.233) CONDITION We examined a sample of 25 participants in the Public Housing Program and identified 4 instances in which the EIV report was not used to verify tenant employment and income information. CAUSE The Authority?s internal control over eligibility compliance requirements was not effective at identifying the need use HUD?s EIV system during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. EFFECT As a result of not using HUD?s EIV system, the Authority has not adequately verified tenant?s income during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. QUESTIONED COSTS None Identified CONTEXT We selected a sample of 25 participants in the Public Housing Program. The Authority has 330 units of Public and Indian Housing. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample.2021-002 ? Eligibility REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority make the following improvements to internal controls over compliance: ? Establish written procedures related to using HUD?s Enterprise Income Verification System(EIV) ? Communicate to staff performing recertifications the requirement to use the EIV system ? Select a sample of recertifications and perform quality control reviews to ensure that EIV is being used. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
2021-002 ? Eligibility Other Matter/Significant Deficiency The Authority is mandated to use HUD?s Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) system as a third party source to verify tenant employment and income information during mandatory reexaminations or recertification of family composition or income. (24 CFR 5.233) The Auditors examined a sample of 25 participants in the Public Housing Program and identified 4 instances in which the EIV report was not used to verify tenant employment and income information. Auditee?s Response and Planned Corrective Action FY 2021 was a challenging year for Property Managers due to the volume of income recertifications caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic, temporary remote work environment caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic, and guidance from HUD which temporarily changed programmatic procedures due to CARES Act waivers and other federal stimulus measures. Regardless of the macro environment, the BHA strives to have 100% accurate files in its Public Housing Program and takes seriously the finding of EIV report issues. The BHA is planning to make the following immediate corrective actions and changes to internal controls: 1. Pay for and require all Property Managers and Assistant Property Managers to attend (reattend) EIV and Income Qualification Trainings hosted by Nan McKay or an equivalent consultant. 2. Establish written procedures related to using HUD?s Enterprise Income Verification System (EIV) and a checklist for all Federal Public Housing certifications. This checklist will be included in each tenant file and used to ensure completeness. 3. Communicate to all Property Managers and Assistant Property Managers performing recertifications that they are required to utilize the EIV system. 4. The Director of Property Management will select a minimum of 10% of recertifications completed each month to perform quality control reviews to ensure that EIV and checklists are being used. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: December 22, 2021 and upon recertification at each property according to schedule below. Development Deadline for Delivering Recert Packets Deadline for 14/30 Day Notice of Rent Change Effective Date of Rent Change KICKHAM 190 Harvard St. August 31st November 30th January 1st COL. FLOYD Foster/Marion St October 31st January 31st March 1st SUSSMAN 50 Pleasant St January 31st April 30th June 1st ? HIGH ST. VETS 176-212 High St. All of New Terrace Rd. February 28th May 31st July 1st TRUSTMAN Amory St., Egmont St., St. Paul St. March 31st June 30th August 1st WALNUT STREET 22 High St., Walnut St May 31st August 31st October 1st ? EGMONT STREET VETS 60s, 70s & 80s bldgs. May 31st August 31st October 1st ? EGMONT STREET VETS Pleasant; St Paul & 50s bldg. June 30th September 30th November 1st ? HIGH ST. VETS 214-224 High & All of Chestnut St June 30th September 30th November 1st Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ana De La Puente, Director of Property Management
2021-003 ? Eligibility Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 ? Housing Choice Voucher Program CFDA #: 14.879 Mainstream Vouchers CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant?s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of our procedures we noted the following: ? Four instances in which the Authority obtained sufficient verifications of participant?s income; however, the participant?s annual income was calculated incorrectly. ? One instance of missing verification of participant?s income CAUSE The Authority?s system of internal controls over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant?s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs are less than $25,000. 2021-003 ? Eligibility CONTEXT We selected a sample of 25 participants from a population of 1,103. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority: ? Develop and implement a quality control review of recertifications ? Develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the family file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-003 ? Eligibility Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 ? Housing Choice Voucher Program CFDA #: 14.879 Mainstream Vouchers CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant?s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of our procedures we noted the following: ? Four instances in which the Authority obtained sufficient verifications of participant?s income; however, the participant?s annual income was calculated incorrectly. ? One instance of missing verification of participant?s income CAUSE The Authority?s system of internal controls over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant?s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs are less than $25,000. 2021-003 ? Eligibility CONTEXT We selected a sample of 25 participants from a population of 1,103. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority: ? Develop and implement a quality control review of recertifications ? Develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the family file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
2021-003 ? Eligibility Other Matter/Significant Deficiency CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant?s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result the auditors procedures the following was noted: ? Four instances in which the Authority obtained sufficient verifications of participant?s income; however, the participant?s annual income was calculated incorrectly. ? One instance of missing verification of participant?s income ? Estimated questioned costs are less than $25,000. Auditee?s Response and Planned Corrective Action FY 2021 was a challenging year for the BHAs Section 8 Department due to the volume of income recertifications caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic, temporary remote work environment caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic, and guidance from HUD which temporarily changed programmatic procedures due to CARES Act waivers and other federal stimulus measures. Additionally, the BHA temporarily relocated files due to its office renovation. The potential for file disruption during the move was compounded by the temporary suspension of SEMAP by HUD which paused the Director of Leased Housing and Assistant Director of Leased Housing?s normal file audit process. Nevertheless, the BHA always strives to have 100% accurate files in its Section 8 Program and takes seriously the finding of verification and income calculation issues. The BHA is planning to make the following immediate corrective actions upon recertification and changes to internal controls: 1. Pay for and require all staff to attend a Nan McKay or an equivalent consultant training. 2. Ensure a recertification checklist is included at the front of each file (and update this checklist with a consultant if appropriate). 3. Communicate to staff that they are required to check-off each part of the recertification checklist and include an income calculation worksheet to ensure file completeness and accuracy. 4. The Director of Leased Housing and Assistant Director of Leased Housing will select a minimum of 10% of recertifications (11+) completed each month as of January 2022 to perform quality control reviews to ensure that files are complete, and income is calculated accurately. This is above and beyond the SEMAP audit requirement to which the Director of Leased Housing already adheres. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: December 22, 2021 and upon recertification Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Carlos Hernandez, Director of Leased Housing
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.