TOWN OF PEMBROKE

EIN: 046001264

UEI: RMSKXQHH7F91

Data as of August 27, 2026

TOWN OF PEMBROKE10 audit years7 findings3 repeat
10
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (35 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Reporting

Expenditures were not reconciled to the general ledger for reporting submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Cause: The Town did not have procedures in place to perform reconciliations of required grant reporting. Effect: It was determined that the Town recorded $310,000 of grant costs in the wrong period in the general ledger. Also, the Town overstated expenditures by approximately $89,000 in reporting submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to reconcile all federal reporting to the general ledger. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding that a reconciliation to the general ledger did not take place. The $310,000 of grant costs were properly obligated at December 31, 2024 with expenditures recorded in a capital project fund.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Direct Award and Passed through Plymouth County, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: The compliance supplement identifies four Key Line Items required to be reported to the federal awarding agency which include (1) current period obligation, (2) cumulative obligation, (3) current period expenditure and (4) cumulative expenditure. Per 2 CFR 200.1, an obligation is an order placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment. Condition: Expenditures were not reconciled to the general ledger for reporting submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Cause: The Town did not have procedures in place to perform reconciliations of required grant reporting. Effect: It was determined that the Town recorded $310,000 of grant costs in the wrong period in the general ledger. Also, the Town overstated expenditures by approximately $89,000 in reporting submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to reconcile all federal reporting to the general ledger. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding that a reconciliation to the general ledger did not take place. The $310,000 of grant costs were properly obligated at December 31, 2024 with expenditures recorded in a capital project fund.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2025-001 Condition: Expenditures were not reconciled to the general ledger for reporting submitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Corrective Action Planned: We will implement procedures to reconcile federal award reporting to the general ledger in the future. The costs noted in the finding will be reclassified in the general ledger and reported in the March 31, 2026 U.S. Treasury reporting. Anticipated Completion Date: April 30, 2026 Contact: William Chenard, Town Manager

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2025 — management decision was due October 28, 2025.

2024-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
QUESTIONED COSTS

One vendor was awarded four contracts without a competitive procurement process. Cause: The Town relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $509,016 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to perform competitive procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through the County of Plymouth, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: One vendor was awarded four contracts without a competitive procurement process. Cause: The Town relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $509,016 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to perform competitive procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

RE: Corrective Action Plan Finding 2024-001 The Town awarded four contracts for engineering services for water projects funded by Federal awards without a competitive procurement process. This was due to a mistaken reliance on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Going forward, the Town will implement policies to perform competitive procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. Sincerely, Michael Buckley, Town Accountant

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2021 — management decision was due September 15, 2021.

2020-001
Other
REPEAT

The Town has not documented its policies regarding federal awards in writing. Cause: Lack of documentation of policies and procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2019-001. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly document all federal awards policies required by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires written policies regarding cash management, determination of allowable costs, employee travel, procurement and subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Town has not documented its policies regarding federal awards in writing. Cause: Lack of documentation of policies and procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2019-001. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly document all federal awards policies required by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The Town has not documented its policies regarding federal awards in writing. Corrective Action Planned: The Town will develop a written federal awards policy. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2021 Contact: Michael Buckley, Town Accountant

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Other →
2020-002
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS

Payroll was charged to the 2020 grant awards for pay periods prior to the approval date by the pass-through agency. Cause: The approval date was later than in prior years and the Town did not adequately plan grant expenditures as a result. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $11,905 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2019-002. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 of the Uniform Guidance, a non-federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: Payroll was charged to the 2020 grant awards for pay periods prior to the approval date by the pass-through agency. Cause: The approval date was later than in prior years and the Town did not adequately plan grant expenditures as a result. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $11,905 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2019-002. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: Payroll was charged to the 2020 grant awards for pay periods prior to the approval date by the pass-through agency. Corrective Action Planned: The School will review the current grant award approval date against payroll and invoices charged against the grant and will remove any charges to the grant outside the period of performance through a journal entry. Going forward payroll and invoices will only be charged to a grant after the approval date of the award. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2021 Contact: Michael Buckley, Town Accountant

Prior Finding References

2019-002

About Period of Performance →

FY 2019-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2020 — management decision was due December 3, 2020.

2019-001
Other

The Town has not documented its policies regarding federal awards in writing. Cause: Lack of documentation of policies and procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly document all federal awards policies required by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires written policies regarding cash management, determination of allowable costs, employee travel, procurement and subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Town has not documented its policies regarding federal awards in writing. Cause: Lack of documentation of policies and procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to properly document all federal awards policies required by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: The Town has not documented its policies regarding federal awards in writing. Corrective Action Planned: The Town will develop a written federal awards policy. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2020 Contact: Michael Buckley, Town Accountant

About Other →
2019-002
Period of Performance
QUESTIONED COSTS

Payroll was charged to the 2019 grant awards for pay periods prior to the approval date by the pass-through agency. Cause: The approval date was later than in prior years and the Town did not adequately plan grant expenditures as a result. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $16,913 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster ? CFDA 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Payroll was charged to the 2019 grant awards for pay periods prior to the approval date by the pass-through agency. Cause: The approval date was later than in prior years and the Town did not adequately plan grant expenditures as a result. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $16,913 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award approval dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants occur during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: Payroll was charged to the 2019 grant awards for pay periods prior to the approval date by the pass-through agency. Corrective Action Planned: The School will review the current grant award approval date against payroll and invoices charged against the grant and will remove any charges to the grant outside the period of performance through a journal entry. Going forward payroll and invoices will only be charged to a grant after the approval date of the award. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2020 Contact: Michael Buckley, Town Accountant

About Period of Performance →

FY 2016-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2017 — management decision was due September 22, 2017.

2016-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.