EIN: 042630450
UEI: NK5CH1GBN4E5
Data as of August 25, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 30, 2025 (422 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Finding - Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Payroll, Assistance Listing Number 93.243; June 30, 2024 award year; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement In accordance with 2 CFR 200.405, A cost is allocable to a Federal award if the cost is assignable to that Federal award with the relative benefits received. These costs must be incurred specifically for the Federal award. Condition Found Of the Seventeen payroll charges selected for testing, the allocation of payroll charged to the Federal grant did not align with the percentage of time incurred specifically for the Federal grant in four instances. Questioned Costs None. Cause The Organization's payroll software did not allocate payroll charges in accordance with the percentage of hours spent working on the Federal grant. Effect Management charged costs to the grant in excess of those costs that were incurred specifically for the grant. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should understand the cause of the misallocation and correct this within their payroll software. Management should additionally ensure adequate review of payroll costs is in place to correct misallocations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding - Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Payroll, Assistance Listing Number 93.243; June 30, 2024 award year; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement In accordance with 2 CFR 200.405, A cost is allocable to a Federal award if the cost is assignable to that Federal award with the relative benefits received. These costs must be incurred specifically for the Federal award. Condition Found Of the Seventeen payroll charges selected for testing, the allocation of payroll charged to the Federal grant did not align with the percentage of time incurred specifically for the Federal grant in four instances. Questioned Costs None. Cause The Organization's payroll software did not allocate payroll charges in accordance with the percentage of hours spent working on the Federal grant. Effect Management charged costs to the grant in excess of those costs that were incurred specifically for the grant. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Management should understand the cause of the misallocation and correct this within their payroll software. Management should additionally ensure adequate review of payroll costs is in place to correct misallocations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding - Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Payroll, Assistance Listing Number 93.243; June 30, 2024, award year; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement In accordance with 2 CFR 200.405, A cost is allocable to a Federal award if the cost is assignable to that Federal award with the relative benefits received. These costs must be incurred specifically for the Federal award. Condition Found Of the Seventeen payroll charges selected for testing, the allocation of payroll charged to the Federal grant did not align with the percentage of time incurred specifically for the Federal grant in four instances. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions It was determined that the allocation percentage assigned in our payroll system did not match the calculated payroll expensed to the grant. Corrective measures: 1) contacted our payroll administrator and determined the cause to be that an allocation percentage was applied to the employee and the employee was also assigning their time via their time sheet effectively calculating twice, first on the total payroll and again on the allocated amount. The employee was instructed not to enter the allocation since it is already done in the payroll system. 2) A monthly review and calculation will be performed by program management and accounting to verify cost allocations are correct. Responsible Official: Korin Ihloff, CFO Expected Completion Date: The issue was addressed immediately.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.