DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH AND SUBSIDIARIES (D/B/A DARTMOUTH HEALTH)

EIN: 020222140

UEI: QYLXERHDAQL4

Data as of August 19, 2026

10
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2025, which was (323 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Cost Allowability
Condition

Cluster: Research and Development (relevant to assistance listing numbers 17.720, 93.859 and 93.846 below) Sponsoring Agency: Department of Labor and Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: VT RETAIN - Phase 2 – New, COBRE-RPL#2 Zeitler, MAIT cells in lupus skin disease, HRSA RCORP NAS 2023-2026, HRSA RMOMS - Resubmission – 1, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Community Mental Health Block Grant, Psychosis Early Action and Resources Award Numbers: 1947RTN2-02B, P20GM148278, 1R01AR080641-01A1, G26RH49907, 1 UK9RH50282-01-00, SS-2022-OCOM-02-CLINI-01, B09SM083987/1B09SM085371 Assistance Listing Title: Disability Employment Policy Development, Biomedical Research and Research Training, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, Rural Health Care Services and Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Assistance Listing Number: 17.720, 93.859, 93.846, 93.912, 93.958 Award Year: 2023-2024 Pass-through entity: Vermont Department of Labor, Not applicable, Not applicable, Not applicable, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, University of New Hampshire Criteria The Dartmouth Health System’s cost transfer approval policy requires approval from the Principal Investigator and Post Award Manager for cost transfers made less than 90 days after discovery. There are limited exceptions where Principal Investigator approval is not required. For all cost transfers that are made more than 90 days after discovery, approval is also required from the Director of Research Operations- Finance. Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for cost transfers, we noted the following across our major programs selected for testing: • Research and development - 4 cost transfers totaling $6.9k out of the 10 selected cost transfers totaling $50.7k were not approved in accordance with policy. • 93.912 - 3 cost transfers totaling $15.2k out of the 5 selected cost transfers totaling $30k were not approved in accordance with policy. • 93.958 - 3 out of the 3 selected cost transfers totaling $42k were not approved in accordance with policy. Cause The Dartmouth Health System did not distribute formal documentation of the cost transfer approval policy. Effect The Dartmouth Health System was not in compliance with its policy with respect to cost transfer approvals and thus cost transfers may not be accepted by federal agencies. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that the Dartmouth Health System formalize and distribute its cost transfer approval policies to individuals responsible for processing cost transfers and perform training to those responsible for the approval process.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding related to cost transfer approval. The Dartmouth-Hitchcock Office of Research Operations experienced significant turnover in Fiscal Year 2024. Management will provide training materials for all new and existing staff in both the Research Post-Award and Research Finance areas to reemphasize the Cost Transfer Policy. Additionally, management will review the current policy on cost transfers to determine whether any updates are needed to better align with current business practices and compliance requirements by June 30, 2025. Leadership Responsible: John Muhlen, System Vice President of Corporate Finance Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-002
Cost Allowability
Condition

Cluster: Research and Development (relevant to assistance listing numbers 17.720 and 93.846 below) Sponsoring Agency: Department of Labor, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Research and Development- VT RETAIN - Phase 2, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research Other major programs: H-1B Rural Healthcare Grant Program, Upstream 2: Increasing mental health and trauma identification and referrals for youth ages 12-18 years, Improving Care for Children and Youth in NH with Trauma and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Project TIDD), Project Launch Upper Valley: Promoting a healthy start for young children and their caregivers, Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) , Community Mental Health Block Grant Award Numbers: 1947RTN2-02, 1R01AR081952-01A, HG-35889-21-60-A-33, 1H79SM084710-01, 1H79SM084906-01, 1H79SM082302-01, 1 GA1RH42907-01-00, SS-2022-OCOM-02-CLINI-01 Assistance Listing Title: Disability Employment Policy Development, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, H-1B Job Training Grants, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance, Rural Health Care Services, Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Assistance Listing Number: 17.720, 93.846, 17.268, 93.243, 93.912, 93.958 Award Year: 2023-2024 Pass-through entity: Vermont Department of Labor, Not applicable, Not applicable, Not applicable, Not applicable, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Criteria 2 CFR 200.430 contains the federal regulatory requirements for internal controls over certifying time expended on sponsored projects. The Dartmouth Health System’s practice is to utilize after-the-fact effort reports to certify that compensation costs charged to federal awards, are reasonable and consistent with the work performed. Actual effort expended on each federal award is certified by a responsible person with suitable means of verification that the work was performed at the end of the specified reporting period. The Dartmouth Health System’s effort certification policy outlines the required deadlines for certifying effort reports related to federal awards. Condition In testing internal controls over effort certifications, we noted the following: • Research and development- 7 of 7 selected effort reports totaling $21.4k were certified/approved outside of allowable timeframe defined by the effort certification policy. They were on average 208 days late. • 17.268- 2 of 2 selected effort reports totaling $7k were certified/approved outside of allowable timeframe defined by the effort certification policy. They were on average 62 days late. • 93.243- 4 of 4 selected effort reports totaling $5k were certified/approved outside of allowable timeframe defined by the effort certification policy. They were on average 78 days late. • 93.912- 3 of 3 selected effort reports totaling $4.3k were certified/approved outside of allowable timeframe defined by the effort certification policy. They were on average 179 days late. • 93.958- 2 of 4 selected effort reports totaling $17.7k were certified/approved outside of allowable timeframe defined by the effort certification policy. They were on average 189 days late. Cause Individuals required to complete quarterly effort certifications did not understand the policy requirements to certify effort in a timely manner. Effect The lack of timely effort certification could result in compensation expenditures charged to federal awards that are not accurate. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that the Dartmouth Health System recommunicate its effort certification policy and provide training to all individuals required to certify effort for federal awards to ensure that the timely approval expectations are understood and adhered to.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding related to effort certifications. Dartmouth-Hitchcock published a new effort policy on February 11, 2025, for all research staff to emphasize the importance of Principal Investigators and Research Staff certifying their efforts on grants promptly. Management will begin implementing and enforcing the policy starting with the quarter ending March 31, 2025. Leadership Responsible: John Muhlen, System Vice President of Corporate Finance Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2025

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-003
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

Cluster: Not applicable Sponsoring Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery Award Numbers: Cheshire Medical Center 2019-BDAS-05-ACCES-04, 05-95-92-920510-7040-5007, RFP-2018-BDAS-05-INTEG Assistance Listing Title: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Year: 2023-2024 Pass-through entity: New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Criteria 2 CFR 200.308 Revision of budget and program plans requires a recipient or subrecipient to request prior written approval from the Federal agency or pass-through entity for changes in key personnel (including employees and contractors) that are identified by name or position in the Federal award. Additionally, the terms of the Opioid STR award agreements at Cheshire Medical Center require changes in staffing, whether temporary or long term, to be provided to the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for approval, 30 calendar days before making the change. Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for key personnel, we selected 4 of the key personnel changes that occurred on the Cheshire Medical Center Opioid STR awards which included key personnel that changed roles or resigned from the System in fiscal year 2024. Management identified replacement key personnel to participate in the grant; however, management did not notify DHHS and did not obtain approval from DHHS regarding the changes. Cause Management did not have a control in place to notify DHHS and request approval for key personnel changes. Effect The granting agency was unaware of key changes made to personnel on the award and may have not concurred with the individual selected to fill the given role(s). Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that management communicate with their agency contacts regarding this matter and implement a control that monitors the key personnel assigned to the grant to ensure that they are notifying the agency of any changes in status and obtaining approval from the agency in a timely manner.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding related to Key Personnel Change Approval at our member, Cheshire Medical Center. The post-award management of this grant is currently handled outside of the Dartmouth Health Research Finance and Post-Award department. Management aims to centralize this function by December 31, 2025. In the interim, Dartmouth Health Management will provide training to award operational staff to implement policies that align with the centrally managed awards by June 30, 2025. Specifically, the Member will conduct a monthly review of key personnel efforts to identify any potential changes that require notification to the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services or any award sponsor in which the Key Personnel Change compliance requirement is required. Leadership Responsible: John Muhlen, System Vice President of Corporate Finance Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-004
Equipment & Real Property
REPEAT
Condition

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: Various Award Names: Various Award Numbers: Various Assistance Listing Title: Various Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Year: 2023- 2024 Pass-through entity: Various Criteria According to 2 CFR section 200.313, procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, at a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. (5) If the non-Federal entity is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures must be established to ensure the highest possible return. Condition The Dartmouth Health System did not have a process in place to ensure that all federally funded equipment included in the fixed asset register were included in its clinical engineering database where monitoring of federally funded equipment is tracked. As a result, while inspection was completed over 3 federal assets in FY2024, the Dartmouth Health System has not completed a physical inventory of all federally purchased fixed assets at least once during the last two years. Additionally, the federal asset listing did not specify all of the details required by 2 CFR section 200.313 (d) (1) such as the percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, asset location and the use and condition of the equipment. The full population of equipment funded with federal research and development dollars, as provided by the Dartmouth Health System, consisted of 15 items with a total historical cost of $122.6k. Cause In FY2024, the Dartmouth Health System was in progress implementing its corrective action plan with respect to the finding identified in FY2022, including creating a federal equipment tracking procedure, inspecting identified federal assets and updating property records to include details required by 2 CFR section 200.313. As the corrective action plan was not fully implemented by the end of FY2024, all compliance requirements with respect to federal equipment were not yet satisfied. Effect The Dartmouth Health System's accounting records for its federally purchased fixed assets could be inaccurate as the Dartmouth Health System has not formally verified the existence, current utilization and continued need for all federally funded equipment through this physical inventory process. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that the Dartmouth Health System implement a process to ensure its policies and procedures over equipment management are followed, including the performance of a physical inventory of federally purchased fixed assets at least once every two years in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(2), updating its property records to include all details required by 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1) and performing a reconciliation between the listing of federally purchased fixed assets and the full fixed asset register to ensure completeness.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding related to Equipment Management. Management conducted a biannual physical inventory count of specific federally purchased research equipment in Fiscal Year 2024. Management did not include all required fields within the clinical engineering database as required by 2 CFR section 200.313 (d) (1) such as the percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, asset location and the use and condition of the equipment. Management will update the clinical engineering database to include these fields within the details by June 30, 2025. Management did not verify the completeness of the listing against the entire federal equipment inventory. Management will establish a quarterly control in which Research Finance will reconcile federal equipment inventory within the clinical engineering database against the Corporate Finance federal equipment listing, starting with the quarter ending March 31, 2025. Leadership Responsible: John Muhlen, System Vice President of Corporate Finance Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2022-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2023, which was (965 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-001
Equipment & Real Property
Condition

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: Various Award Names: Various Award Numbers: Various Assistance Listing Title: Various Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Year: 2021- 2022 Pass-through entity: Various Criteria According to 2 CFR section 200.313, procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, at a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. (5) If the non-Federal entity is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures must be established to ensure the highest possible return. Condition The Health System did not perform a physical inventory of federally purchased fixed assets at least once during the last two years. Additionally, the federal asset listing did not specify all of the details required by 2 CFR section 200.313 (d) (1) such as asset locations, tag numbers, use and condition. The full population of equipment funded with federal research and development dollars, as provided by the Health System, consisted of 9 items with a total historical cost of $105k. Cause The Health System lacks a process to ensure that policies and procedures related to identifying and managing its federally purchased fixed assets in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.313 are followed, including updating property records to include all required data elements and the performance of a physical inventory at least once every two years. Effect The Health System's accounting records for its federally purchased fixed assets could be inaccurate as the Health System has not formally verified the existence, current utilization and continued need for the equipment through this physical inventory process. Additionally, without maintaining tag numbers and records of asset locations, safeguarding of assets could be impacted. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that the Health System implement a process to ensure its policies and procedures over equipment management are followed, including the performance of a physical inventory of federally purchased fixed assets at least once every two years in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(2), and updating its property records to include all details required by 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1). Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of prior audit findings and status.

Corrective Action Plan

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: Various Award Names: Various Award Numbers: Various Assistance Listing Title: Various Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Year: 2021- 2022 Pass-through entity: Various Management agrees with the finding related to the federal equipment inventory and tracking. To address these deficiencies Research Operations will work closely with Corporate Finance, Facilities, and Purchasing to create a federal equipment tracking procedure that allows inventory to be identified and located in order to conduct an inventory at a minimum of every two years. Furthermore, the tracking system will include all of the detail surrounding the equipment needed to meet the requirements of 2 CFR section 200.313 (d) (1). Leadership Responsible: Barbara A. Vance, PhD, CRA, Vice President, Research Operations Anticipated Completion Date: 03/31/2024

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2022-002
Other
Condition

Cluster: All represented on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (?SEFA?) Sponsoring Agency: All federal agencies represented on the SEFA Award Names: All awards on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards on the SEFA Award Year: All awards on the SEFA Pass-through entity: All identified on the SEFA Criteria 2 CFR 200.512 Report Submission requires the audit be completed and the data collection form and Uniform Guidance reporting package submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition The Health System?s Uniform Guidance reporting package was due to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by March 31, 2023, however, since the report was not filed until June 2023, the report is considered late. Cause Our understanding is that management experienced turnover in their research operations department and as a result, audit preparation was delayed. As a result of the findings that were identified in our testing of the in-scope major programs, additional time was also needed to complete the audit procedures and for management to consider an appropriate corrective action plan. Effect Not receiving the Uniform Guidance reporting package in a timely manner could impact the oversight and monitoring procedures performed by the federal government and other constituents. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend management ensure controls are in place to allow for subsequent audits to be completed in a timely manner, consistent with previous years. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of prior audit findings and status

Corrective Action Plan

Cluster: All represented on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (?SEFA?) Sponsoring Agency: All federal agencies represented on the SEFA Award Names: All awards on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards on the SEFA Award Year: All awards on the SEFA Pass-through entity: All identified on the SEFA Management agrees with this finding related to the late submission of the UG Audit Report. The current year audit process was not indicative of the typical audit process for D-HH. Management has subsequently hired additional staff and will file the audit timely moving forward. Leadership Responsible: Barbara A. Vance, PhD, CRA, Vice President, Research Operations Anticipated Completion Date: 3/31/2024

About Other →
2022-003
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Names: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: All pass-through entities noted on the SEFA Criteria 2 CFR 200.332 notes that pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: 1. Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. 2. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. 3. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521. Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.331(f) requires that the entity verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F? Audit Requirements when it is expected that the subrecipient?s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ?200.501 Audit requirements ($750,000). Condition In testing conformity with the compliance requirements for subrecipient monitoring, we selected 7 of the 61 Research and Development subrecipient agreements and the one Opioid STR subrecipient agreement from the detailed listings provided for testing. The total federal funds passed through to subrecipients in FY22 amounted to $3.5 million for the Research & Development Cluster, and $24,500 for the Opioid STR program. For all of our selections, the most recent audit report was not reviewed for purposes of ongoing monitoring as required by the Uniform Guidance. The Health System has a risk assessment form that is completed at contract inception for its subrecipients; however, the risk assessment is not reassessed annually for all subrecipients. The most recent risk assessment form was conducted in 2018 for 2 selections, in 2019 for 2 selections, in 2020 for 2 selections and in 2021 for 2 selections. We further noted that 7 of the 8 risk assessment forms selected for testing did not include explicit documentation detailing the subrecipient audit report review (such as what year was reviewed, what were the results of the review, etc.). Additionally, for one selection, the initial subrecipient risk assessment form was reviewed after the subrecipient award agreement was executed. Cause The Health System?s subrecipient policy does not explicitly state the ongoing monitoring activities that must be conducted or the frequency of required monitoring. For instance, the policy does not outlinemonitoring activities that are required for all subrecipients. Additionally, the risk assessment form does not prescribe the details of the subrecipient audit report review that should be documented. Effect The subrecipients of the Health System may have audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided from the Health System that may have implications on the compliance of the Health System with Uniform Guidance. Additionally, there may be changes in the risk characteristics of subrecipients that are not identified if risk assessments are not periodically updated. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend that he Health System update its subrecipient monitoring policy to reflect all monitoring compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In particular, the policy should require the receipt of the Uniform Guidance report from all subrecipients that expended $750,000 or more in federal awards during the subrecipient?s fiscal year (or the receipt of the subrecipient?s latest financial statements if not) at contract inception. Any audit findings pertaining to the Federal award should be followed up on by the Health System and a management decision should be issued. This Policy should be distributed and adhered to by all that have a role in the subrecipient monitoring process of the Health System. Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management?s response is included in ?Management?s Views and Corrective Action Plan? included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.

Corrective Action Plan

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Names: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Numbers: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Title: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Assistance Listing Number: All awards with subrecipients on the SEFA Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: All pass-through entities noted on the SEFA Management agrees with the finding related to the Subrecipient Risk Assessments. To address these deficiencies Research Operations will update its subrecipient monitoring policy to explicitly state the ongoing monitoring activities that must be conducted and the frequency of required monitoring. Additionally, training will be provided to the staff who perform the risk assessment to ensure they are documenting the details of the review including the date and results of the subrecipient audit report review. Furthermore, updates will be made to the risk assessment procedure to ensure subrecipient annual audits are reviewed and the results of the review and follow-up are sufficiently documented. To ensure compliance, internal monitoring will be performed. Leadership Responsible: Barbara A. Vance, PhD, CRA, Vice President, Research Operations Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2023; Monitoring of compliance will continue throughout FY24

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense Award Names: First-in-human clinical translation of a near-infrared, nerve-specific fluorophore to facilitate tissue-specific fluorescence-guided surgery; Self-Administered, Motor-Free, Cognitive Screening Battery for MS: Development and Initial Validation; Decision Making in Transmasculine Genital Reconstruction Surgery (TMGRS) Award Numbers: 1R01NS116994-01A1; W81XWH2010330; R21DK124733 Assistance Listing Title: Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders; Military Medical Research and Development; Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research Assistance Listing Number: 93.853; 12.420; 93.847 Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: Not applicable Criteria The Health System has a policy whereby purchases shall comply with Uniform Guidance for Grants and Cooperative agreements, as established in 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be followed and they have adopted $10,000 as their micro-purchase threshold. 2 CFR 200.318 requires that documentation of the history of the procurement, the procurement method and rationale for the method selected, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and basis for the contract price to be included in the procurement file. Additionally, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures and is prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). The Health System?s suspension and debarment policy requires suspension and debarment verifications to be completed for all vendors utilized on federal awards, regardless of expenditure amount. Condition As part of the Research and Development cluster procurement testing of new purchases greater than $10,000 there were 4 transactions selected for testing out of a population of 21 transactions totaling $481,000. We noted two transactions of $69,500 and $12,000 where there was no documentation of the vendor justification, but were determined to be sole source. Management was able to provide us with an understanding of why the vendor was selected; however, this sole source justification was not documented in the procurement files. Additionally, as part of the testing over compliance with the Health System?s suspension and debarment verification policy, we noted one vendor with expenditures of $1,400 where the suspension and debarment verification was not performed in advance of paying the related invoice. We received evidence of the suspension and debarment verification completed after invoice payment, where no exclusions were identified. Cause While the procurement policy outlines the procedures to be followed for federal purchases, there is no formal review to ensure all federal documentation requirements related to purchases above the micropurchase threshold have been included in the procurement files. Additionally, there is no formal review to ensure that suspension and debarment verifications have been completed for all vendors prior to invoice payment. Effect The lack of adherence to established policies for bidding documentation and sole source justification and a formal process for review could result in competition being inappropriately limited. The lack adherence to the suspension and debarment verification policy could result in the Health System conducting business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the Health System formalize the documentation and review required for procurements over the micro-purchase threshold, including review of multiple vendor quotations or sole source justification documentation prior to the purchase being made. Additionally, the Health System should ensure that timely suspension and debarment verifications are completed in line with policy. Management?s View and Corrective Action Plan Management?s views and corrective action plan are included at the end of this report after the summary of status of prior audit findings

Corrective Action Plan

Cluster: Research and Development Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense Award Names: First-in-human clinical translation of a near-infrared, nerve-specific fluorophore to facilitate tissue-specific fluorescence-guided surgery; Self-Administered, Motor-Free, Cognitive Screening Battery for MS: Development and Initial Validation; Decision Making in Transmasculine Genital Reconstruction Surgery (TMGRS) Award Numbers: 1R01NS116994-01A1; W81XWH2010330; R21DK124733 Assistance Listing Title: Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders; Military Medical Research and Development; Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research Assistance Listing Number: 93.853; 12.420; 93.847 Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: Not applicable Management agrees with the finding related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. To address these deficiencies Research Operations will conduct staff training for Departmental Research Administrators to ensure staff are knowledgeable of the current policy and the documentation requirements related to purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. D-H is currently following the required procedures but will ensure that the procurement files include supporting documentation, including review of multiple vendor quotations or sole source justification documentation. Furthermore, D-H will update procedures to ensure that all purchases have evidence of the suspension and debarment verification completed prior to payment. Leadership Responsible: Barbara A. Vance, PhD, CRA, Vice President, Research Operations Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2023

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-005
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

Cluster: Not applicable Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery Support Services Award Numbers: T1081685 Assistance Listing Title: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: NH Dept of Health and Human Services Criteria To be eligible under the Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery Support Services award, a patient must 1) have income below 400% of the federal poverty level, 2) be a resident of New Hampshire or experiencing homelessness in New Hampshire, and 3) be determined positive for substance use disorder. Additionally, patient income information for all eligible patients receiving services must be updated at a minimum interval of once every four weeks. Condition Cheshire Medical Center operates The Doorway program in Keene, NH. The Doorway connects patients positive for substance use disorder with support services and treatment, and receives a portion of its funding from the Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery Support Services federal award. Through our testing of eligibility requirements for 25 patients, we noted the following: ? For all selections, no formal documentation was maintained regarding patient income levels. ? For all selections, income reassessments were not completed and documented at least once every four weeks. ? One selected patient was neither a resident of New Hampshire, nor experiencing homelessness in New Hampshire. While The Doorway provides services to patients beyond those defined as eligible under the Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery Support Services award, there is no differentiation between patients that are eligible or ineligible under the federal program. As a result of patients not being differentiated, time and effort incurred by personnel on the award is commingled with non-award activity. For example, a clinician?s salary is funded under the award, but she is not seeing only eligible patients. As such, any time she spent treating a patient who is not eligible would be a questioned cost under the grant. Cause The nature and purpose of the federal program is very similar and consistent with the mission and operations of The Doorway. Management did not understand the need to differentiate the services performed and patients served in order to demonstrate compliance with award terms and conditions. Effect The commingling of activities between federal and non-federal programs does not allow for compliance with award specific terms and conditions and with eligibility requirements to be effectively managed. Questioned Costs We were unable to verify eligibility requirements were met for the program which had total expenditures of $838,932. Recommendation We recommend that internal controls and policies be implemented to manage the eligibility requirements of the federal awards and ensure that documentation to support eligibility determinations is maintained. Further, procedures to differentiate patients eligible under the award from those determined to beineligible, along with a mechanism to track the time and expenses associated with eligible patients should be put in place. Management?s View and Corrective Action Plan Management's views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of prior audit findings and status.

Corrective Action Plan

Cluster: Not applicable Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery Support Services Award Numbers: T1081685 Assistance Listing Title: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Year: 2021 - 2022 Pass-through entity: NH Dept of Health and Human Services Management understands and agrees that there was a failure to follow the documentation requirements of the Opioid STR award during the majority of the time period covered by the audit. In June 2022 the Doorway began implementing a screening tool used at the time of patient intake to determine which patients are eligible under the grant. Additionally, a process will be implemented to perform the required income reassessments every 4 weeks and to track time and differentiate costs between eligible and non-eligible patients. Any patient deemed ineligible in the initial screening or subsequent four week reassessments will continue to be treated, but the associated cost will not be charged to the grant. This documentation will be reviewed a minimum of two times per year by Cheshire?s Compliance Manager, and more frequently if errors are found. Results will be reported to the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer Cheshire has implemented a separation of duties where the clinic administrator will ensure and maintain appropriate documentation, while a senior finance analyst will review and verify appropriateness prior to invoicing the grant. This process will add an additional check to be certain only eligible patients are charged to the grant. Leadership Responsible: Daniel Gross, Chief Financial Officer ? Cheshire Medical Center Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2023

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Eligibility →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.