EIN: 016000020
UEI: MLLMBKS2LVQ5
Data as of August 22, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 22, 2026 (154 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The City’s Health and Community Services Department charged personnel time to the grants listed above that was not based on actual work performed, but on budgeted amounts. Cause: Although the personnel time spent on the grant exceeded the amount charged to the grants listed above, the time was based on budgeted percentages and not actual time worked. Effect: Actual personnel time charged to the grant was not documented, was based on budgeted amounts, and therefore, unallowable. Known Questioned Costs: ALN Program Agreement Amount 93.387/93.243/93.788/93.959 National and State Tobacco Control Program/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Opioid STR/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CD6 23-4425B 2,223.09 93.243/93.959 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse OSA 24-373A 636.45 10.561 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program OFI 22-351/ OFI 24-351 752.22 Likely Questioned Costs: ALN Program Agreement Amount 93.387/93.243/93.788/93.959 National and State Tobacco Control Program/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Opioid STR/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CD6 23-4425B 394,316.61 93.243/93.959 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse OSA 24-373A 79,326.10 10.561 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program OFI 22-351/ OFI 24-351 252,382.22 Recommendations: The City should ensure that all grant payroll is allocated to grants based on time worked. If time is allocated on a budgeted amount, then there should be a true up or reconciliation of actual time at the end of each grant.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-003 Allowable Costs – Time and Effort Documentation for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, for the following grants: Agency COVID Assistance Listing Program Agreement Number SAMHSA 93.387 National and State Tobacco Control Program CD6 23-4425B SAMHSA 93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects OSA 24-373A DHHS 93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects CD6 23-4425B DHHS 93.788 Opioid STR CD6 23-4425B DHHS 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CD6 23-4425B DHHS COVID 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CD6 23-4425B DHHS 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse OSA 24-373A USDA 10.561 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program OFI 22-351/ OFI 24-351 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance §200.430 Compensation - personal services, charges for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, unless the entity’s system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges and to make necessary adjustment such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: The City’s Health and Community Services Department charged personnel time to the grants listed above that was not based on actual work performed, but on budgeted amounts. Cause: Although the personnel time spent on the grant exceeded the amount charged to the grants listed above, the time was based on budgeted percentages and not actual time worked. Effect: Actual personnel time charged to the grant was not documented, was based on budgeted amounts, and therefore, unallowable. Known Questioned Costs: ALN Program Agreement Amount 93.387/93.243/93.788/93.959 National and State Tobacco Control Program/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Opioid STR/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CD6 23-4425B 2,223.09 93.243/93.959 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse OSA 24-373A 636.45 10.561 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program OFI 22-351/ OFI 24-351 752.22 Likely Questioned Costs: ALN Program Agreement Amount 93.387/93.243/93.788/93.959 National and State Tobacco Control Program/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Opioid STR/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse CD6 23-4425B 394,316.61 93.243/93.959 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse OSA 24-373A 79,326.10 10.561 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program OFI 22-351/ OFI 24-351 252,382.22 Recommendations: The City should ensure that all grant payroll is allocated to grants based on time worked. If time is allocated on a budgeted amount, then there should be a true up or reconciliation of actual time at the end of each grant.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: In March of 2025 during the audit process, we were asked about reporting budgeted hours vs. actual hours. Based on that inquiry, we have been working on Time Effort Timesheets for those individuals who allocate their time over 2 or more cost centers. These Time Effort Timesheets commenced July 2025 and are now standard practice as part of weekly payroll reporting.
In FY 2024, the City had several expenditures that were charged to the CDBG program that were approved by City employees not directly involved with or familiar with the CDBG program. Cause: There are general expenditures the City sometimes charges to the CDBG program that are approved by the Department Managers and not by the CDBG program manager. Effect: The CDBG program manager is sometimes not aware of certain costs charged to the program until after they have been posted to its expenditures. In addition, the risk that a cost that is not allowable under the CDBG program is increased. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should ensure that all expenditures charged to the CDBG program are reviewed and approved by the program manager before they are posted to the program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-004 Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing #14.218 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance §200.303 requires that grant recipients establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal awards in compliance with the terms and conditions of the awards. The management of such awards includes overseeing allowable costs charged to the grant and ensuring expenditures fall within the period of performance for the grant, which requires knowledge of the grant. Condition: In FY 2024, the City had several expenditures that were charged to the CDBG program that were approved by City employees not directly involved with or familiar with the CDBG program. Cause: There are general expenditures the City sometimes charges to the CDBG program that are approved by the Department Managers and not by the CDBG program manager. Effect: The CDBG program manager is sometimes not aware of certain costs charged to the program until after they have been posted to its expenditures. In addition, the risk that a cost that is not allowable under the CDBG program is increased. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should ensure that all expenditures charged to the CDBG program are reviewed and approved by the program manager before they are posted to the program.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The City of Bangor’s Community Development Block Grant program receives direct oversight by the Community Development Officer, responsible for ensuring compliance with Federal regulations, including the determination of eligibility, allowability, and allocability of all financial expenditures. Previously, the City’s practice concerning CDBG funds provided to other departments allowed those project managers to directly charge the CDBG account through payroll, requisition or direct charges which are not first reviewed and approved by the Community Development Officer. The Community Development Officer has implemented the following procedural changes: 1. Executing Interdepartmental Subrecipient Agreements. This document establishes certain standards and expectations for CDBG-funded programs. In 2025-26, Agreements will create new procedural safeguards including submitting requisitions for all expenditures not contained in the approved budget, and to submit receipts or invoices to the Community Development office directly to back up all approved expenses. 2. The Community Development Officer must review and sign off on all expenses charged to the CDBG account by Community and Economic Development Staff, including “OK To Pay” charges, and requisitions. The Community Development Officer recommends the following changes: 1. The issuance of a separate credit card to be used exclusively for CDBG expenditures. The reconciliation process is very tedious and involves sifting through unrelated expenses, and some expenses which are allocated to CDBG which have not been initiated by the Community Development Division and were deemed ineligible by the Community Development Officer. This creates some challenges finding another account to charge to, often a month or more after the expense occurred. The CDBG program does a monthly drawdown for administrative costs, which requires the CDO to make adjustments for expenses that are discovered during the reconciliation process. 2. Eliminating the practice of providing CDBG account numbers to individual departments to directly charge expenses. This leaves the program particularly vulnerable, as when a department charged nearly $435,000 to the CDBG account, requiring reversal of charges that were not eligible. The CDO believes that this change should be initiated by the Finance department with cooperation by the CED. 3. Establishing a review process for personnel expense outside of Salary and Fringe Benefit. Many charges in SunGard related to 701 charges are not viewable as they are deemed privileged expenses. However, some charges for personnel expenses have required review and reversal, and in one case a charge for “travel” was discovered for a program that does not involve this activity. The Finance Department might consider a change to include review if necessary.
The City had some Cash on Hand reports that were not filed by the filing deadline of thirty days after the quarter end. In addition, the City did not file any FFATA reports for FY 2024. Cause: Two of the quarterly Cash on Hand Reports were filed more than thirty days after the quarter’s end. In addition, in FY 2024, the City changed the determination of subawards from beneficiaries to subrecipients. However, the City did not take the steps to file the required FFATA reports for those subrecipients. Effect: Lack of timely reporting could result in delays or reductions of future funding. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should implement procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed as required by the reporting deadlines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-005 Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing #14.218 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: Under the CDBG program, the City is required to submit quarterly Cash on Hand reports. In addition, as the City has subawards that exceed the Federal threshold of $30,000, the City would be required to submitted reports in accordance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA). Condition: The City had some Cash on Hand reports that were not filed by the filing deadline of thirty days after the quarter end. In addition, the City did not file any FFATA reports for FY 2024. Cause: Two of the quarterly Cash on Hand Reports were filed more than thirty days after the quarter’s end. In addition, in FY 2024, the City changed the determination of subawards from beneficiaries to subrecipients. However, the City did not take the steps to file the required FFATA reports for those subrecipients. Effect: Lack of timely reporting could result in delays or reductions of future funding. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should implement procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed as required by the reporting deadlines.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Administrative conditions related to this issue include a delay in entitlement award which caused the City to not complete any IDIS Drawdowns until December 2024. However, during that time, program income was received, and the CDO understands that the report should have been filed to reflect COH at the deadline. The Community Development Officer consulted with staff from the Auditing firm in July 2023 to inquire about the relevance of FFATA and was told that these reports were not required because the City did not award CDBG funds to Subrecipients. However, several key awards made prior to 2022 were made pursuant to an executed Subrecipient Agreement and would be subject to this requirement. The CDO received clarification on this issue in the Fall of 2024 from HUD during a regional training of all CDBG entitlement communities. It is further understood that all CDBG funds, excluding that provided to income eligible beneficiaries is a Subrecipient for the purpose of FFATA. Pursuant to these findings, the Community Development Officer began revising the CDBG Policies and Procedures to implement these reporting obligations, including: 1. Monthly reports submitted on the FFATA website for any award made to an entity not expressly deemed an eligible beneficiary. This includes nonprofit and for-profit entities completing an approved activity which provides a benefit to low- and moderate-income residents of Bangor. This does not include payments made to or on behalf of LMI individuals in the Homeowner Rehab or Down Payment Assistance programs, but may include all other grants or loans made over $30,000. This will be accomplished by additional training on the use of the online portal and the integration of City software into the project award and reporting process. 2. The CDO continues to review the Cash On Hand reporting process to implement changes which will prevent further delays in reporting. The CDO recently implemented a quarterly desk audit of all CDBG Financials and continues to improve Department efficiency in this area. In addition, staff will be cross-trained to complete this procedure to ensure that personnel changes do not impact the report filing. This will be accomplished by requiring that the Cash on Hand report be entered monthly and updated until the report is submitted at the end of the Quarter.
In FY 2024, the City did not complete transfers for all of the required local match. Cause: In FY 2024, the City approved an amendment to the project agreement, which required an increase in the total local contribution. However, an additional transfer to the capital projects fund to increase the local contribution. Effect: As of fiscal year end, the City had not met the matching requirements for that particular program. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: City staff should ensure that amendments to existing agreements are incorporated into all existing compliance requirements for the grants, including matching requirements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-006 Department of Transportation Assistance Listing #20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Cluster for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: The grant agreements with the Department of Transportation under the Bangor Area Comprehensive Transportation System (BACTS) program require the City to contribute a local portion to each approved project (matching). The City ensures it meets the matching requirements at the beginning of each project by transferring to the capital projects fund the local portion for that project. Condition: In FY 2024, the City did not complete transfers for all of the required local match. Cause: In FY 2024, the City approved an amendment to the project agreement, which required an increase in the total local contribution. However, an additional transfer to the capital projects fund to increase the local contribution. Effect: As of fiscal year end, the City had not met the matching requirements for that particular program. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: City staff should ensure that amendments to existing agreements are incorporated into all existing compliance requirements for the grants, including matching requirements.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: Management and staff were made aware of the amendment to the agreement. Going forward, staff will scan the council agenda for amendments to BACTS agreements.
The School Department had two significant grant expenditures for playground equipment and a leased modular, both of which exceeded the Federal Procurement thresholds. However, the School Department did not perform procurement procedures in accordance with Federal Procurement standards, such as obtaining quotes from a sufficient number of qualified vendors. In addition, the Suspension and Debarment check was not supported by documentation dated prior to the dates of the expenditures. Cause: The School Department relied on its historical knowledge and experience of the vendors and therefore did not adhere to the usual procurement procedures. In addition, the School Department did not document a check of the vendors’ Suspension and Debarment status on Sam.gov prior to entering into the transactions. Effect: The School Department runs the risk that certain costs under the grant will be disallowed or that the School Department will contract with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The School Department should have in place procedures to ensure that all grant purchases that exceed the procurement thresholds follow the required Federal Procurement standards and are sufficiently documented. That includes documentation of the vendors’ Suspension and Debarment status.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-007 Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing #21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: Under the CSLFRF grant, recipients are required to follow Federal procurement standards when grant expenditures exceed the required thresholds. In addition, the Bangor School Department has adopted a procurement policy that adheres to Uniform Guidance requirements for procurement, suspension and debarment. In addition, if the procurement is a sole source procurement, the procurement must meet additional requirements. Condition: The School Department had two significant grant expenditures for playground equipment and a leased modular, both of which exceeded the Federal Procurement thresholds. However, the School Department did not perform procurement procedures in accordance with Federal Procurement standards, such as obtaining quotes from a sufficient number of qualified vendors. In addition, the Suspension and Debarment check was not supported by documentation dated prior to the dates of the expenditures. Cause: The School Department relied on its historical knowledge and experience of the vendors and therefore did not adhere to the usual procurement procedures. In addition, the School Department did not document a check of the vendors’ Suspension and Debarment status on Sam.gov prior to entering into the transactions. Effect: The School Department runs the risk that certain costs under the grant will be disallowed or that the School Department will contract with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The School Department should have in place procedures to ensure that all grant purchases that exceed the procurement thresholds follow the required Federal Procurement standards and are sufficiently documented. That includes documentation of the vendors’ Suspension and Debarment status.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Bangor School Department recently adopted DJR- Federal Procurement Manual on 03.20.25. DJR contains a section on Debarment and Suspension – Appendix 1, section H (page 16). Currently, two staff members have created login ID’s. Going forward, the results from the System for Award Management (SAM) will be saved in the electronic project folders. GameTime Playground equipment – the Bangor School Department has a ten-year track record using GameTime at all K-5 schools. The choice was made for consistency, quality, delivery, and selection. Going forward the BSD will document in the RFP its intent to pursue consistent purchasing over a multi-year period. Fruit Street portable classroom – the chosen vendor (Schiavi) was made in March 2023 (FY 2023) because they were the only vendor that could fit us into their production window, complete, ship, and install the portable classroom. The BSD then had to retro fit a sprinkler system in the portable as well as $200,000 of utility hook ups. The project was completed missing only one semester of class time.
The City had a disbursement to a beneficiary dated September 30, 2023 that should have been included on the report for the quarter ending September 30, 2023. However, the expenditure was not reported until the report for the quarter ending December 31, 2023. Cause: Although the report for the quarter ending September 30, 2023 was not submitted until the end of October 2023, a disbursement done before the end of the quarter was not included in the report. Effect: Information reported to Treasury and subsequently to the public was incomplete. Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should review grant expenditures to ensure all uses of funds are included in the correct quarterly reports. In addition, the City should develop procedures, such as secondary review, to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reports.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-008 Department of the Treasury Assistance Listing #21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: In order to promote transparency, 2nd tier communities, as ranked by the Treasury, are required to submit project and expenditure reports quarterly that include all projects funded by ARPA. The City is also required to implement controls that ensure the accuracy and completeness of the reports. Condition: The City had a disbursement to a beneficiary dated September 30, 2023 that should have been included on the report for the quarter ending September 30, 2023. However, the expenditure was not reported until the report for the quarter ending December 31, 2023. Cause: Although the report for the quarter ending September 30, 2023 was not submitted until the end of October 2023, a disbursement done before the end of the quarter was not included in the report. Effect: Information reported to Treasury and subsequently to the public was incomplete. Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should review grant expenditures to ensure all uses of funds are included in the correct quarterly reports. In addition, the City should develop procedures, such as secondary review, to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reports.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: Management will review grant expenditures to ensure all uses of funds are included in the correct quarterly reports. In addition, the grant manager, Charles McInnis (207) 992-4184 has implemented a weekly audit of all SLFRF accounts to ensure accuracy. This process should eliminate any potential for errors on the quarterly reporting process. This process will be on-going with an expected expiration date after the last quarterly report for SLFRF has been submitted.
The City had four monthly reports that were not submitted in a timely manner. Cause: Reports were not submitted to the State of Maine within the fifteen-day threshold. Effect: Late reports may impact future grant funding. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The City should implement procedures to ensure that all grant reports are submitted by required reporting deadlines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-009 Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing #93.788, #93.959; #93.243 Opioid STR/ Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: The grant agreement for the Opioid STR/Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects programs requires the City to submit monthly financial reports within fifteen days after that month’s end. In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires the City to establish internal controls to ensure compliance. Condition: The City had four monthly reports that were not submitted in a timely manner. Cause: Reports were not submitted to the State of Maine within the fifteen-day threshold. Effect: Late reports may impact future grant funding. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The City should implement procedures to ensure that all grant reports are submitted by required reporting deadlines.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: There were conflicting due dates in the grant awards. Page 5 of 48 indicated Invoices *should* be submitted the 15th day of the following month of service, *all invoices*, including final MUST be submitted NLT 45 days after the last day of the month for which the service being billed for was performed. On page 12 of 48 the table indicated invoices were due 15 days after each month. It wasn't until Feb 2024 when we received clarification of due dates for invoices which were to use the table on page 12. Justification for late submission for July & Aug 2023 invoices was because we did not receive the *encumbered contract* until 9/13/23. We are unable to submit invoices until we receive the encumbered contract. The Grant Accounting Specialist has created a tracking system for financial reporting which is currently in place.
2023-002
The program had one subaward for which it did not gather information sufficient to ensure that expenditures were incurred prior to reimbursement, in accordance with cash management requirements. In addition, the City did not gather information to ensure that expenditures were for allowable costs. Cause: The Department of Health and Community Services, which administers the program, relied on prior experience and knowledge of the subrecipient. Therefore, the City did not require the subrecipient to submit monthly reports or expenditure detail other than payroll information. Effect: The City may be exposed to risk related to disallowed costs or the risk of noncompliance for cash management purposes. Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should consider implementing policies and procedures for monitoring subrecipients for all grant requirements, including allowable costs and cash management.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-010 Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing #93.959, #93.788, #93.243, #93.387 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse/ Opioid STR/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects, and the National and State Tobacco Control Program for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: According to the Uniform Guidance, grant recipients that make subawards must monitor subrecipients to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes, which includes verifying funds are spent before reimbursement is requested and that expenditures are for allowable costs. In addition, the City is required to implement internal controls over subrecipient monitoring and subrecipient cash management to ensure compliance. Condition: The program had one subaward for which it did not gather information sufficient to ensure that expenditures were incurred prior to reimbursement, in accordance with cash management requirements. In addition, the City did not gather information to ensure that expenditures were for allowable costs. Cause: The Department of Health and Community Services, which administers the program, relied on prior experience and knowledge of the subrecipient. Therefore, the City did not require the subrecipient to submit monthly reports or expenditure detail other than payroll information. Effect: The City may be exposed to risk related to disallowed costs or the risk of noncompliance for cash management purposes. Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should consider implementing policies and procedures for monitoring subrecipients for all grant requirements, including allowable costs and cash management.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: Program managers review and approve each line of reimbursement on the monthly invoices to ensure the allowable costs. After the Grants Accounting Specialist attended a national grant management conference in MAR25, she has since put a plan in place requesting copies of receipts to match a month of invoice (2x per year).
The Transit Department included encumbrances in its calculation of expenditures eligible for Federal reimbursement. Encumbrances are commitments to purchase goods or services in the future, but do not represent accrual-based expenditures eligible for reimbursement. In addition, the Transit Department included the costs of its portion of the City’s property and liability insurance, which was not competitively procured in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. After the auditor identified these unallowable costs, they were removed from the expenditure population subject to Federal grant reimbursement. Cause: The Transit Department mistakenly included encumbrances in the pool of Federal expenditures for reimbursement. The insurance policy is an allocation of the City’s costs and is not directly procured by the Transit Department. The City’s policy covers Federal and non-Federal activities, and the City did not consider it subject to Uniform Guidance procurement guidelines. Effect: The City Transit Department could have requested reimbursement for ineligible costs. However, because the error was caught before the grant request was remitted, the Transit Department made the necessary corrections. Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Transit Department should revise their grant request template to remove or back out outstanding encumbrances. In addition, any costs not competitively procured should be charged to the Transit Department’s local share as an ineligible cost to avoid inclusion in the Federal expense pool. Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Transit Department will revise its reimbursement template to exclude encumbrances and unallowable costs and charge non-competitively procured shared costs to the local share.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2024-011 Department of Transportation #20.507-20.526 Federal Transit Cluster for the period July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Criteria: The grant reimburses a percentage of total operating and capital costs incurred by the City’s Transit Department, dba Community Connector, not to exceed the grant award amount. Costs within the pool subject to reimbursement must meet the Uniform Guidance’s cost principle and procurement guidelines. Condition: The Transit Department included encumbrances in its calculation of expenditures eligible for Federal reimbursement. Encumbrances are commitments to purchase goods or services in the future, but do not represent accrual-based expenditures eligible for reimbursement. In addition, the Transit Department included the costs of its portion of the City’s property and liability insurance, which was not competitively procured in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. After the auditor identified these unallowable costs, they were removed from the expenditure population subject to Federal grant reimbursement. Cause: The Transit Department mistakenly included encumbrances in the pool of Federal expenditures for reimbursement. The insurance policy is an allocation of the City’s costs and is not directly procured by the Transit Department. The City’s policy covers Federal and non-Federal activities, and the City did not consider it subject to Uniform Guidance procurement guidelines. Effect: The City Transit Department could have requested reimbursement for ineligible costs. However, because the error was caught before the grant request was remitted, the Transit Department made the necessary corrections. Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Transit Department should revise their grant request template to remove or back out outstanding encumbrances. In addition, any costs not competitively procured should be charged to the Transit Department’s local share as an ineligible cost to avoid inclusion in the Federal expense pool. Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Transit Department will revise its reimbursement template to exclude encumbrances and unallowable costs and charge non-competitively procured shared costs to the local share.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Transit Department will revise its reimbursement template to exclude encumbrances and unallowable costs and charge non-competitively procured shared costs to the local share.
FAC accepted this audit on August 26, 2024 — management decision was due February 26, 2025.
2023-002 SAMHSA Assistance Listing #93.788 Opioid STR for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The grant agreement for Opioid STR requires the City to file monthly financial reports with the State within a certain specified period of time and to accurately reflect amounts expended under the agreement. In addition, the City is required to establish internal controls and procedures to ensure compliance with requirements. Condition - The January 2023, March 2023, April 2023, May 2023, and June 2023 reports were not filed by the required deadlines. In addition, an expenditure dated September 1, 2022 was reported on the August 2022 report. Cause - Reports were filed more than fifteen days after the month end, which was outside of the required deadline. Effect - Lack of timely reporting could result in delays or reductions of future funding. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations - The City should implement a review process to ensure that reports are filed with accurate expenditure information. In addition, the City should use a reminder system for report deadlines to ensure they are filed by the required deadlines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-002 SAMHSA Assistance Listing #93.788 Opioid STR for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The grant agreement for Opioid STR requires the City to file monthly financial reports with the State within a certain specified period of time and to accurately reflect amounts expended under the agreement. In addition, the City is required to establish internal controls and procedures to ensure compliance with requirements. Condition - The January 2023, March 2023, April 2023, May 2023, and June 2023 reports were not filed by the required deadlines. In addition, an expenditure dated September 1, 2022 was reported on the August 2022 report. Cause - Reports were filed more than fifteen days after the month end, which was outside of the required deadline. Effect - Lack of timely reporting could result in delays or reductions of future funding. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations - The City should implement a review process to ensure that reports are filed with accurate expenditure information. In addition, the City should use a reminder system for report deadlines to ensure they are filed by the required deadlines.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: Staff is aware of the reporting deadlines. The Grant in question provides guidance that invoices submitted for payment are required to error-free and have all necessary supporting documents. It further states that invoices and the Monthly Financial Report “should” be filed by the 15th but “must” be filed no later than 45 days from the end of the month. Staff relied on this guidance, along with discussions with other industry professionals, to prepare and file the reports. The 45-day window was relied upon if supporting documentation was lacking or staffing/scheduling issues arose. All reports and invoices were filed within the 45-day window. The Director of the Public Health and Community Services Department will ensure that all grant managers are made aware that the 15th should be used as the reporting deadline for future reporting.
The required Wage Rate Requirements language is currently not included in construction contracts. Cause: The Bangor School Department does not include the Wage Rate Requirement language in the construction contracts, but instead refers in those contracts to separate documents that contain the required language. Effect: Contractors and subcontractors may potentially not be informed of the Wage Rate Requirements, which may cause the Bangor School Department to be in noncompliance with such requirements. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: Instead of including language in the construction contracts that refers to other documents, the Bangor School Department should instead include the required language directly in the construction contracts.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-004 Department of Education Assistance Listing #84.025D-W Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to include in their construction contracts subject to Wage Rate Requirements (a.k.a. the Davis Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. Condition: The required Wage Rate Requirements language is currently not included in construction contracts. Cause: The Bangor School Department does not include the Wage Rate Requirement language in the construction contracts, but instead refers in those contracts to separate documents that contain the required language. Effect: Contractors and subcontractors may potentially not be informed of the Wage Rate Requirements, which may cause the Bangor School Department to be in noncompliance with such requirements. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: Instead of including language in the construction contracts that refers to other documents, the Bangor School Department should instead include the required language directly in the construction contracts.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: City and School contracts have the original Request for Proposals attached as “part of the contract”. These Requests for Proposals contain the required Davis-Bacon Wage requirements, when needed, so the concern that contractors may be unaware of the requirements is extremely remote. This has been a long-standing practice across all Departments utilizing Federal funding and has not been identified as an issue previously. To address this finding the City and School will modify their Construction contracts to contain the Wage Requirement language in both the main body of the contract as well as continuing to be within the attached contract documents.
2023-005 Department of Transportation Assistance Listing #20.106 Airport Improvement Program for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The FAA requires the SF-425 reports to be based on the costs already invoiced. In addition, the City should have internal controls and procedures to ensure the reports are filed with the required information. Condition – The airport submitted a SF-425 report that included additional expenses of $192K that had not been invoiced. Cause – The grant closeout for AIP #79 was being processed at the same time as the SF-425, which included the additional expenses and the airport included the same expenses in the SF-425. Effect – The SF-425 that was submitted for AIP #79 during FY 23 was not in agreement with the reporting requirements of the FAA. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – Airport management should review the SF-425’s to ensure that they only include expenses that have been invoiced by the date of the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-005 Department of Transportation Assistance Listing #20.106 Airport Improvement Program for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The FAA requires the SF-425 reports to be based on the costs already invoiced. In addition, the City should have internal controls and procedures to ensure the reports are filed with the required information. Condition – The airport submitted a SF-425 report that included additional expenses of $192K that had not been invoiced. Cause – The grant closeout for AIP #79 was being processed at the same time as the SF-425, which included the additional expenses and the airport included the same expenses in the SF-425. Effect – The SF-425 that was submitted for AIP #79 during FY 23 was not in agreement with the reporting requirements of the FAA. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – Airport management should review the SF-425’s to ensure that they only include expenses that have been invoiced by the date of the report.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: The report in question was created by a third party vendor on behalf of the Airport. Airport staff, who reviewed and signed the report missed the reporting error. There has been subsequent staffing turnover at the Airport and the reporting requirements have been brought in-house. Future reports will be prepared by the Airport Financial Manager.
2023-006 Department of Transportation Assistance Listing #20.205 Federal Highway Planning and Construction for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The Uniform Guidance requires contractors and subcontractors to submit to the nonfederal entity a weekly copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance with Wage Rate Requirements (certified payroll) for each week in which work was performed under the construction contract. Condition – The City had one project (Broadway Pedestrian Improvements) for which a weekly certified payroll was missing. Cause – Either the contractor or subcontractor did not submit the required certified payroll or the City did not retain a copy of the certified payroll. Effect – The City may not be able to perform the required monitoring under Wage Rate Requirements and ensure that contractors and subcontractors are paying their employees the prevailing federal wage rates. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – City Management should ensure that the contractors and subcontractors are submitting to them the weekly certified payrolls as required.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-006 Department of Transportation Assistance Listing #20.205 Federal Highway Planning and Construction for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The Uniform Guidance requires contractors and subcontractors to submit to the nonfederal entity a weekly copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance with Wage Rate Requirements (certified payroll) for each week in which work was performed under the construction contract. Condition – The City had one project (Broadway Pedestrian Improvements) for which a weekly certified payroll was missing. Cause – Either the contractor or subcontractor did not submit the required certified payroll or the City did not retain a copy of the certified payroll. Effect – The City may not be able to perform the required monitoring under Wage Rate Requirements and ensure that contractors and subcontractors are paying their employees the prevailing federal wage rates. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – City Management should ensure that the contractors and subcontractors are submitting to them the weekly certified payrolls as required.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: City staff relied upon the electronic wage database system for verification of certified payrolls from contractors. During the year, the wage reporting system experienced issues which resulted in some certified payrolls not being recorded. Staff understand the need to ensure compliance with the wage rate requirements and will verify all certified payrolls are collected either through the reporting system or manually as needed.
2023-007 Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing #14.218 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Cluster for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to include in their construction contracts subject to Wage Rate Requirements (a.k.a. the Davis Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. Condition – The Community Development Department has grant agreements with its subrecipients that include the Wage Rate Requirements language. However, the contracts between the subrecipients and the contractors were missing from the files, so we were unable to ascertain whether the required language was communicated to the contractors and subcontractors. Cause – The Community Development Department failed to either obtain or retain a copy of the contract between the subrecipient and the contractor for the grants. Effect – The City may not be able to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are aware of the Wage Rate Requirements for work performed under the grants. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – City Management should ensure that the contractors and subcontractors are submitting to them the weekly certified payrolls as required.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-007 Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing #14.218 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Cluster for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities to include in their construction contracts subject to Wage Rate Requirements (a.k.a. the Davis Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. Condition – The Community Development Department has grant agreements with its subrecipients that include the Wage Rate Requirements language. However, the contracts between the subrecipients and the contractors were missing from the files, so we were unable to ascertain whether the required language was communicated to the contractors and subcontractors. Cause – The Community Development Department failed to either obtain or retain a copy of the contract between the subrecipient and the contractor for the grants. Effect – The City may not be able to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are aware of the Wage Rate Requirements for work performed under the grants. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – City Management should ensure that the contractors and subcontractors are submitting to them the weekly certified payrolls as required.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: Significant turnover occurred within the Community & Economic Development Department with some staff exiting mid-projects. Replacement staff were not immediately available, and positions remained vacant for some time. Other staff who do not primarily deal with these types of projects, assisted as needed but some requirements were missed. The Department became fully staffed during Fiscal Year 2024 and new guidance and procedures were developed to address this concern. Those procedures include pre-bid information to contractors so better understand their requirements and the posting of wage information within the bid packet versus referencing the federal website.
2023-008 Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing #14.218 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Cluster for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – When CDBG funds are used for rehabilitation, the grantee must ensure that the work is properly completed. That responsibility includes verifying that pre-rehabilitation inspections were performed, and that deficiencies detected as part of the pre-rehabilitations were included in the rehabilitation contract. In addition, the grantee must have in place certain internal controls to ensure that disbursements under the rehabilitation projects are approved and contracts have the required signatures. Condition – The City had one rehabilitation loan file that was missing the pre-rehabilitation inspection. In addition, the City had another rehabilitation loan file that had a contract that was missing the signature of the contractor. There was a third rehabilitation loan file that had a disbursement with a missing approval. Cause – The Community Development Department experienced turnover in staff. As a result, some of the documentation in the rehabilitation files was incomplete. Effect – The Community Development Department may not be able to verify that all of the rehabilitation loans are in compliance with the requirements. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – The Community Development Department should ensure that all loan files are complete and that all required documentation has the required specifications, approvals, and signatures.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-008 Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing #14.218 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Cluster for the period July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Criteria – When CDBG funds are used for rehabilitation, the grantee must ensure that the work is properly completed. That responsibility includes verifying that pre-rehabilitation inspections were performed, and that deficiencies detected as part of the pre-rehabilitations were included in the rehabilitation contract. In addition, the grantee must have in place certain internal controls to ensure that disbursements under the rehabilitation projects are approved and contracts have the required signatures. Condition – The City had one rehabilitation loan file that was missing the pre-rehabilitation inspection. In addition, the City had another rehabilitation loan file that had a contract that was missing the signature of the contractor. There was a third rehabilitation loan file that had a disbursement with a missing approval. Cause – The Community Development Department experienced turnover in staff. As a result, some of the documentation in the rehabilitation files was incomplete. Effect – The Community Development Department may not be able to verify that all of the rehabilitation loans are in compliance with the requirements. Known Questioned Costs - None Likely Questioned Costs - None Recommendations – The Community Development Department should ensure that all loan files are complete and that all required documentation has the required specifications, approvals, and signatures.
Management’s Response/Corrective Action Plan: Significant turnover occurred within the Community & Economic Development Department with some staff exiting mid-projects. Replacement staff were not immediately available, and positions remained vacant for some time. Other staff who do not primarily deal with these types of projects assisted as needed but some requirements were missed. The Department became fully staffed during Fiscal Year 2024 and new guidance and procedures were developed to address this concern. Those procedures include revised rehabilitation contracts and additional training for new staff.
FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2023 — management decision was due January 13, 2024.
The City currently does not have written procedures as required by the Uniform Guidance as specified in the criteria. Cause: Although the City has adequate procedures in place to prevent non-compliance for most of its Federal grants, those procedures have not been documented. Effect: Without written procedures, the City runs the risk of non-compliance for Federal grants. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: Although the City has implemented some written procedures and policies, it has not developed written procedures for all required areas or for all federal grants. We recommend that all departments that administer federal grants develop the required written procedures and policies.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-001 ? Uniform Guidance Written Policies Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance ?200.302 Financial Management, the non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ?200.305 (Federal payment), and written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of the Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City currently does not have written procedures as required by the Uniform Guidance as specified in the criteria. Cause: Although the City has adequate procedures in place to prevent non-compliance for most of its Federal grants, those procedures have not been documented. Effect: Without written procedures, the City runs the risk of non-compliance for Federal grants. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: Although the City has implemented some written procedures and policies, it has not developed written procedures for all required areas or for all federal grants. We recommend that all departments that administer federal grants develop the required written procedures and policies.
Management response/corrective action: The City began to develop the required written procedures; however, significant staffing losses and turnover curtailed the process. As positions are re-filled, Management will make the completion of the written procedures a priority in all areas that administer federal grants
2021-002
FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2022 — management decision was due November 23, 2022.
The School Department charged personnel time to the Local Entitlement grant that was not based on actual work performed but on budgeted amounts. Cause: Although the personnel time spent on the grant exceeded the amount charged to the Local Entitlement grant, the time was based on budgeted percentages and not actual time worked. Effect: Actual personnel time charged to the grant was not documented, was based on budgeted amounts, and therefore, unallowable. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: To avoid future non-compliance in this area, the School Department should not charge any personnel to grants if they work on more than one Federal grant or split their time between Federal and non-Federal work.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-001 ? Department of Education, for the Period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, Assistance Listing #84.027-84.173; Special Education Cluster Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance ?200.430 Compensation - personal services, charges for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, unless the non-Federal entity?s system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges and to make necessary adjustment such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: The School Department charged personnel time to the Local Entitlement grant that was not based on actual work performed but on budgeted amounts. Cause: Although the personnel time spent on the grant exceeded the amount charged to the Local Entitlement grant, the time was based on budgeted percentages and not actual time worked. Effect: Actual personnel time charged to the grant was not documented, was based on budgeted amounts, and therefore, unallowable. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: To avoid future non-compliance in this area, the School Department should not charge any personnel to grants if they work on more than one Federal grant or split their time between Federal and non-Federal work.
Management response/corrective action: Following past practices which your team has demonstrated were in error, the School Department used budgeted estimates when applying time to the local entitlement grant. We believe that keeping a time log for the numerous grants would not be practicable and would use upwards of 5% of the work time. Each day, the time spent by the grant accountant is typically very fluid, frequently transitioning from one grant to another then back again. Therefore, the School Department has taken your advice to not apply any time to Federal grants. The change was made when we were made aware of the audit finding - February 15, 2022.
The City currently does not have written procedures as required by the Uniform Guidance as specified in the criteria. Cause: Although the City has adequate procedures in place to prevent non-compliance for most of its Federal grants, those procedures have not been documented. Effect: Without written procedures, the City runs the risk of non-compliance for Federal grants. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should review its Federal grants and determine which grants need specific written procedures to meet the Uniform Guidance requirements. Management response/corrective action: The City has begun to develop the required written procedures by particular funding awards. These work will need to be expanded to ensure the appropriate procedures are in place for all federal expenditures.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-002 ? Uniform Guidance Written Policies Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance ?200.302 Financial Management, the non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ?200.305 (Federal payment), and written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of the Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The City currently does not have written procedures as required by the Uniform Guidance as specified in the criteria. Cause: Although the City has adequate procedures in place to prevent non-compliance for most of its Federal grants, those procedures have not been documented. Effect: Without written procedures, the City runs the risk of non-compliance for Federal grants. Known Questioned Costs: None Likely Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The City should review its Federal grants and determine which grants need specific written procedures to meet the Uniform Guidance requirements. Management response/corrective action: The City has begun to develop the required written procedures by particular funding awards. These work will need to be expanded to ensure the appropriate procedures are in place for all federal expenditures.
Management response/corrective action: The City has begun to develop the required written procedures by particular funding awards. These work will need to be expanded to ensure the appropriate procedures are in place for all federal expenditures.
FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2019 — management decision was due August 7, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2018 — management decision was due September 13, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.